Pinpoint · Judgment search

Local Democracy Matters Inc v Minister for Local Government

[2018] NSWLEC 9

Land and Environment Court of NSW · 16 February 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2018: 1 citing judgment 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Randwick City Council v Minister for Local Government [2018] NSWLEC 63 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (9)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6 Cited cited 1,033×
  2. ONE.TEL Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 270 Cited cited 282×
  3. Kiama Council v Grant [2006] NSWLEC 96 Cited cited 100×
  4. Hunter Development Corporation v Save Our Rail NSW Incorporated [2015] NSWCA 346 Cited cited 3×
  5. Hunter Development Corporation v Save Our Rail NSW Incorporated (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 375 Cited cited 28×
  6. Woollahra Municipal Council v Minister for Local Government [2016] NSWCA 380 Cited cited 4×
  7. [2017] HCASL 143 Cited
  8. Shellharbour City Council v Minister for Local Government [2017] NSWCA 256 Distinguished cited 22×
  9. Ku-ring-gai Council v Garry West as delegate of the Acting Director-General, Office of Local Government [2017] NSWCA 54 Cited cited 16×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.