Pinpoint · Judgment search

Weston in his capacity as liquidator of Starcom Group Pty Ltd (in liq) v Rajan

[2019] FCA 1455

Federal Court of Australia · 9 September 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 5

2020: 3 citing judgments 2021: 2 citing judgments 2022: 1 citing judgment 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Stone v Ebeid [2020] FCA 343 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Nowra Radiology Pty Ltd v Macintosh [2020] FCA 731 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Jahani (liquidator) v Commissioner of Taxation [2020] FCA 1642 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Jahani (liquidator) v Alfabs Mining Equipment Pty Ltd, in the matter of Delta Coal Mining Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2021] FCA 927 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Jahani (liquidator) v Alfabs Mining Equipment Pty Ltd, in the matter of Delta Coal Mining Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2021] FCA 1195 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. Ford v Commissioner of Taxation, in the matter of Careers Australia Group Limited (in liq) (No 2) [2022] FCA 1151 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (4)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Quick, William Gary v Stoland Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1200 Cited cited 94×
  2. Seven Sydney v Fuji Xerox [2004] NSWSC 902 Cited cited 32×
  3. Chocolate Factory Apartments v Westpoint Finance & Ors [2005] NSWSC 784 Applied or followed cited 105×
  4. CPB Contractors Pty Limited v Celsus Pty Limited (formerly known as SA Health Partnership Nominees Pty Ltd) (No 2) [2018] FCA 2112 Cited cited 21×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.