Pinpoint · Judgment search

Zonnevylle v Minister for Education

[2019] NSWCATAD 28

NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · 13 February 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Cited 11

2019: 2 citing judgments 2020: 4 citing judgments 2021: 2 citing judgments 2022: 2 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Zonnevylle v Minister for Education and Early Childhood Learning [2019] NSWCATAD 108 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 7× · judgment
  2. Zonnevylle v Minister for Education and Early Childhood Learning [2019] NSWCATAP 274 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 8× · judgment
  3. Department of Education v Zonnevylle [2020] NSWCATAD 96 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 13× · judgment
  4. Taylor v Destination NSW [2020] NSWCATAD 137 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 13× · judgment
  5. Zonnevylle v Department of Education [2020] NSWCATAP 162 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 2× · judgment
  6. Minister for Education and Early Childhood Learning v Zonnevylle [2020] NSWCA 232 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 19× · judgment
  7. Zonnevylle v Secretary, Department of Education [2021] NSWCATAD 361 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 8× · judgment
  8. FBQ v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 375 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  9. Dibb v Transport for NSW (No 2) [2022] NSWCATAP 89 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 6× · judgment
  10. Zonnevylle v Secretary, Department of Education [2022] NSWCATAD 121 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 2× · judgment
  11. Irvine v Temora Shire Council [2024] NSWCATAD 201 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (6)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Li v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 19 Cited cited 33×
  2. Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63 Cited cited 1,161×
  3. Camilleri v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2012] NSWADT 5 Cited cited 105×
  4. Smalley v Motor Accident Authority of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 318 Cited cited 21×
  5. Stanley v Roads and Maritime Services [2014] NSWCATAD 123 Cited cited 22×
  6. Smith v Pittwater Council [2016] NSWCATAD 67 Cited cited 18×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.