Pinpoint · Judgment search

Burgess v R

[2019] NSWCCA 13

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 13 February 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Cited 9

2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 2 citing judgments 2022: 3 citing judgments 2023: 3 citing judgments 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. O’Sullivan v R [2019] NSWCCA 261 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 9× · judgment
  2. Kliendienst v R [2020] NSWCCA 98 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 34× · judgment
  3. DL v R [2020] NSWCCA 164 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  4. Robson-Bolan v R [2022] NSWCCA 1 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Moananu v R [2022] NSWCCA 85 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  6. R v McKenzie [2022] NSWCCA 119 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  7. Benn v R [2023] NSWCCA 24 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 19× · judgment
  8. R v Lincoln [2023] NSWDC 68 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  9. R v Mulholland [2023] NSWLC 10 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. R v MacDonnell [2002] NSWCCA 34 Cited cited 58×
  3. Regina v Burgess [2006] NSWCCA 319 Cited cited 7×
  4. JT v R [2012] NSWCCA 133 Cited cited 15×
  5. Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Cited cited 1,170×
  6. Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114 Cited cited 114×
  7. Nguyen v The Queen [2016] HCA 17 Cited cited 71×
  8. Biddle v R [2017] NSWCCA 128 Cited cited 21×
  9. Chaouk v R [2017] NSWCCA 295 Cited cited 9×
  10. Tuite v R [2018] NSWCCA 175 Cited cited 10×
  11. Healey v R [2018] NSWCCA 214 Cited cited 3×
  12. Ngati v R [2018] NSWCCA 32 Cited cited 12×
  13. Kresovic v R [2018] NSWCCA 37 Cited cited 21×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.