Pinpoint · Judgment search

Walker v R

[2019] NSWCCA 4 ; (2019) 96 NSWLR 1

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 1 February 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 18 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 4 Cited 14

2019: 4 citing judgments 2020: 3 citing judgments 2021: 2 citing judgments 2023: 6 citing judgments 2024: 3 citing judgments 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Roos v R [2019] NSWCCA 67 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 28× · judgment
  2. White v R [2019] NSWCCA 168 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Daaboul v R [2019] NSWCCA 191 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment
  4. TB v R [2019] NSWCCA 224 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  5. Hijazi v R [2020] NSWCCA 97 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  6. Pethybridge v R [2020] NSWCCA 185 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  7. Martin v R [2020] NSWCCA 192 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  8. Nguyen v R [2021] NSWCCA 85 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  9. Shiv v R [2021] NSWCCA 245 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  10. HS v R [2023] NSWCCA 54 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  11. McCarthy v R [2023] NSWCCA 56 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  12. Noud v R [2023] NSWCCA 157 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  13. Hanna v R [2023] NSWCCA 182 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  14. HA v R [2023] NSWCCA 274 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  15. Berntsen v R [2023] NSWCCA 296 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  16. Chambers v R [2024] NSWCCA 94 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  17. Omigie v R [2024] NSWCCA 205 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  18. MacDonald v R [2024] NSWCCA 240 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (12)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. MacKenzie v The Queen [1996] HCA 35 Cited cited 246×
  2. Osland v The Queen [1998] HCA 75 Cited cited 129×
  3. REGINA v MARKULESKI [2001] NSWCCA 290 Cited cited 264×
  4. MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53 Cited cited 513×
  5. TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151 Cited cited 117×
  6. Still v R [2010] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 16×
  7. Miller v R [2014] NSWCCA 34 Cited cited 12×
  8. ML v R [2015] NSWCCA 27 Cited cited 12×
  9. Tsaccounis v R [2016] NSWCCA 163 Cited cited 5×
  10. Darby v R [2016] NSWCCA 164 Applied or followed cited 7×
  11. Jafary v R [2018] NSWCCA 243 Cited cited 18×
  12. Stanford v R [2018] NSWCCA 249 Cited cited 7×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.