Pinpoint · Judgment search

Miller v R

[2014] NSWCCA 34

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 21 March 2014 · Official judgment

Cited by 12 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 11

2015: 3 citing judgments 2018: 2 citing judgments 2019: 2 citing judgments 2023: 5 citing judgments 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Tuala [2015] NSWCCA 8 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 135× · judgment
  2. Miller v R [2015] NSWCCA 205 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  3. Stevens v R [2015] NSWCCA 235 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  4. R v Bechalany [2018] NSWSC 493 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  5. R v Toller [2018] NSWDC 287 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  6. Walker v R [2019] NSWCCA 4 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 18× · judgment
  7. LS v R [2019] NSWCCA 258 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  8. HS v R [2023] NSWCCA 54 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  9. McCarthy v R [2023] NSWCCA 56 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  10. R v Fineff [2023] NSWDC 108 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  11. Noud v R [2023] NSWCCA 157 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  12. HA v R [2023] NSWCCA 274 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (62)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Johnson v Miller [1937] HCA 77 Cited cited 198×
  2. Ratten v The Queen [1974] HCA 35 Cited cited 163×
  3. Petelin v Cullen [1975] HCA 24 Cited cited 65×
  4. Lawless v The Queen [1979] HCA 49 Cited cited 59×
  5. R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 Cited cited 218×
  6. R v Towers (1984) 14 A Crim R 12 Cited cited 7×
  7. Gallagher v The Queen [1986] HCA 26 Cited cited 144×
  8. R v King [1987] 1 QB 547 Applied or followed cited 6×
  9. Morris v The Queen [1987] HCA 50 Cited cited 128×
  10. R v Clarkson [1987] VR 962 Cited cited 16×
  11. Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×
  12. R v Love (1989) 18 NSWLR 608 Cited cited 2×
  13. Mickelberg v The Queen [1989] HCA 35 Cited cited 187×
  14. S v The Queen [1989] HCA 66 Cited cited 135×
  15. Doney v The Queen [1990] HCA 51 Cited cited 244×
  16. R v JMR (1991) 39 A Crim R 39 Cited cited 5×
  17. Peters v R (1991) 92 CLR 493 Cited cited 2×
  18. R v Hamilton (1991) 92 Cr App R 54 Cited cited 2×
  19. R v Rinaldi; R v Kessey (1993) 30 NSWLR 605 Cited cited 9×
  20. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  21. May v O'Sullivan [1995] HCA 38 Cited cited 15×
  22. Walsh v Tattersall [1996] HCA 26 Cited cited 101×
  23. MacKenzie v The Queen [1996] HCA 35 Applied or followed cited 246×
  24. Fleming v The Queen [1998] HCA 68 Cited cited 328×
  25. Siganto v The Queen [1998] HCA 74 Cited cited 173×
  26. Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37 Cited cited 415×
  27. R v Serratore [1999] NSWCCA 377 Cited cited 65×
  28. R v Moffatt [2000] NSWCCA 174 Cited cited 36×
  29. MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53 Cited cited 513×
  30. R v Bikic [2002] NSWCCA 227 Cited cited 26×
  31. R v M [2002] NSWCCA 66 Cited cited 17×
  32. Regina v Emad Sleiman [2003] NSWCCA 231 Cited cited 14×
  33. Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52 Cited cited 984×
  34. R v Abou-Chabake [2004] NSWCCA 356 Applied or followed cited 104×
  35. REGINA v KALDOR [2004] NSWCCA 425 Cited cited 41×
  36. Regina v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 20 Cited cited 71×
  37. R v Gent [2005] NSWCCA 370 Cited cited 104×
  38. Chahine v R [2006] NSWCCA 179 Cited cited 17×
  39. The Queen v Hillier [2007] HCA 13 Cited cited 167×
  40. Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 1 Applied or followed cited 601×
  41. Keir v R [2007] NSWCCA 149 Cited cited 12×
  42. Porter v R [2008] NSWCCA 145 Distinguished cited 58×
  43. Sultan v R [2008] NSWCCA 175 Cited cited 2×
  44. Nikolaidis v R [2008] NSWCCA 323 Cited cited 6×
  45. BJR v R [2008] NSWCCA 43 Cited cited 23×
  46. The Queen v Keenan [2009] HCA 1 Cited cited 43×
  47. Rasic v R; Johnny Lee Vella v R; Damien Charles Vella v R [2009] NSWCCA 202 Cited cited 59×
  48. Doja v R [2009] NSWCCA 303 Cited cited 37×
  49. Karl SULEMAN v R [2009] NSWCCA 70 Cited cited 30×
  50. R v Damon Charles Miller [2009] NSWDC 331 Cited
  51. The Queen v Nguyen [2010] HCA 38 Cited cited 45×
  52. Still v R [2010] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 16×
  53. SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13 Cited cited 428×
  54. Raumakita v R [2011] NSWCCA 126 Cited cited 30×
  55. Flack v R [2011] NSWCCA 167 Cited cited 14×
  56. KHANWAIZ, Shajeel v R; KHANVEZ, Noman v R; KHANWAIZ, Zeeshan v R. [2012] NSWCCA 168 Cited cited 23×
  57. Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Cited cited 340×
  58. LMN v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 52 Cited cited 2×
  59. R v Belghar [2012] NSWCCA 86 Cited cited 60×
  60. Tonari v R [2013] NSWCCA 232 Cited cited 23×
  61. Outram v R [2013] NSWCCA 329 Cited cited 6×
  62. Carlton v R [2014] NSWCCA 14 Cited cited 15×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.