Pinpoint · Judgment search

Regina v Emad Sleiman

[2003] NSWCCA 231

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 21 August 2003 · Official judgment

Cited by 14 indexed judgments

All Cited 14

2004: 2 citing judgments 2006: 1 citing judgment 2012: 3 citing judgments 2014: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 2 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 2003 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Regina v LTP [2004] NSWCCA 109 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 7× · judgment
  2. R v Abou-Chabake [2004] NSWCCA 356 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 104× · judgment
  3. REGINA v POOLE [2006] NSWCCA 93 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  4. Da Silva v R [2012] NSWCCA 129 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Ayoub v R [2012] NSWCCA 190 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  6. SKA v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 205 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  7. Miller v R [2014] NSWCCA 34 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 12× · judgment
  8. Yazdani v R [2016] NSWCCA 194 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  9. DV v R [2017] NSWCCA 276 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  10. Thafer v R [2019] NSWCCA 143 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  11. Balachandran v R [2020] NSWCCA 12 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  12. WG v R; KG v R [2020] NSWCCA 155 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 7× · judgment
  13. Fuller v R [2021] NSWCCA 194 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  14. Mehajer v R [2024] NSWCCA 226 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Anderson & Morris (1966) 2 QB 110 Cited cited 4×
  2. Pemble v The Queen [1971] HCA 20 Cited cited 146×
  3. Ratten v The Queen [1974] HCA 35 Cited cited 163×
  4. Lawless v The Queen [1979] HCA 49 Cited cited 59×
  5. Gallagher v The Queen (1985) 160 CLR 392 Cited cited 7×
  6. Mickelberg v The Queen [1989] HCA 35 Cited cited 187×
  7. R v Duang (1992) 61 A Crim R 140 Cited cited 11×
  8. R v R Salama [1999] NSWCCA 105 Cited cited 6×
  9. Gilbert v The Queen [2000] HCA 15 Cited cited 225×
  10. Doggett v The Queen [2001] HCA 46 Cited cited 69×
  11. REGINA v PLV [2001] NSWCCA 282 Cited cited 54×
  12. Regina v J W S Rose [No 10] [2001] NSWSC 1060 Cited
  13. R v Bikic [2002] NSWCCA 227 Cited cited 26×
  14. R v Rose [2002] NSWCCA 455 Cited cited 30×
  15. R v M [2002] NSWCCA 66 Cited cited 17×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.