Pinpoint · Judgment search

Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited (No 4 - examination orders)

[2021] FCA 1237

Federal Court of Australia · 12 October 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2021: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited (No 5 - Indictment) [2021] FCA 1345 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited (No 6 - additional examination orders) [2021] FCA 1383 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. BXD18 (by her litigation representative Marie Theresa Arthur) v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCA 123 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (7)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Barton v The Queen [1980] HCA 48 Cited cited 186×
  2. Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd [1987] HCA 23 Cited cited 369×
  3. R v Basha (1989) 39 A Crim R 337 Cited cited 79×
  4. R v Butler (1991) 24 NSWLR 66 Cited cited 13×
  5. Tony Strickland (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [2018] HCA 53 Cited cited 76×
  6. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited (No 3 - privilege claims) [2021] FCA 1208 Cited cited 3×
  7. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 511 Cited cited 5×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.