Pinpoint · Judgment search

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Palmerston Police Station Case)

[2021] FCAFC 7

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 4 February 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Cited 7

2021: 4 citing judgments 2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Ingham (The 180 Brisbane Construction Case) (No 2) [2021] FCA 263 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Australian Workers' Union [2021] FCA 861 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  3. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Adelaide Airport Case) [2021] FCA 951 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  4. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Holl (The Wheeler Cranes Case) [2021] FCA 1480 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Australian Workers' Union [2022] FCAFC 143 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 6× · judgment
  6. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v J Hutchinson Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 1007 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  7. Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Fair Work Ombudsman (The 250 East Terrace Case) [2023] FCAFC 161 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 5× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (8)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  3. Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26 Cited cited 816×
  4. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  5. Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46 Cited cited 467×
  6. Parker v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2019] FCAFC 56 Cited cited 48×
  7. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Menon [2020] FCA 1418 Cited cited 12×
  8. Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177 Cited cited 67×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.