Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Scott

[2021] NSWDC 342

District Court of NSW · 4 May 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Bunning v Cross [1978] HCA 22 Cited cited 116×
  2. Lippl v Haines (1989) 18 NSWLR 620 Cited cited 21×
  3. Fleming v The Queen [1998] HCA 68 Cited cited 328×
  4. Robinett v Police [2000] SASC 405 Applied or followed cited 11×
  5. R v HELMHOUT [2001] NSWCCA 372 Cited cited 19×
  6. DPP v Carr [2002] NSWSC 194 Cited cited 38×
  7. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS v COE [2003] NSWSC 363 Cited cited 9×
  8. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS v. AM [2006] NSWSC 348 Cited cited 20×
  9. PARKER v COMPTROLLER-GENERAL OF CUSTOMS [2007] NSWCA 348 Cited cited 20×
  10. Parker v Comptroller-General of Customs [2009] HCA 7 Cited cited 85×
  11. DPP (Victoria) v Kaba & Anor (2014) 247 A Crim R 300 Cited
  12. State of New South Wales v Bouffler [2017] NSWCA 185 Cited cited 12×
  13. State of New South Wales v Randall [2017] NSWCA 88 Cited cited 28×
  14. R v Grech; R v Kadir [2017] NSWCCA 288 Cited cited 5×
  15. New South Wales v Robinson [2019] HCA 46 Cited cited 30×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.