Pinpoint · Judgment search

Stevenson v R

[2022] NSWCCA 133

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 22 June 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 3

2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Ibrahim v R [2022] NSWCCA 161 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  2. Harper v R [2022] NSWCCA 211 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 9× · judgment
  3. R v RM (No. 6) [2023] NSWDC 305 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  4. LS v R [2024] NSWCCA 110 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (52)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29 Cited cited 405×
  2. Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37 Cited cited 415×
  3. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  4. Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×
  5. R v Moussa [2001] NSWCCA 427 Cited cited 29×
  6. TKWJ v The Queen [2002] HCA 46 Cited cited 244×
  7. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  8. Regina v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 20 Cited cited 71×
  9. Regina v NZ [2005] NSWCCA 278 Cited cited 44×
  10. Gately v The Queen [2007] HCA 55 Cited cited 25×
  11. Gassy v The Queen [2008] HCA 18 Cited cited 24×
  12. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×
  13. Corby v R [2010] NSWCCA 146 Cited cited 44×
  14. SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13 Applied or followed cited 428×
  15. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  16. R v Brown [2012] NSWCCA 199 Applied or followed cited 70×
  17. PD v R [2012] NSWCCA 242 Cited cited 65×
  18. EJDG v R [2012] NSWCCA 251 Cited cited 8×
  19. BJS v R [2013] NSWCCA 123 Cited cited 60×
  20. MARTIN, Geoffrey Keith v REGINA [2014] NSWCCA 124 Applied or followed cited 35×
  21. Jarrett v R [2014] NSWCCA 140 Not followed cited 14×
  22. JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Cited cited 295×
  23. R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56 Cited cited 178×
  24. Filippou v The Queen [2015] HCA 29 Cited cited 283×
  25. Beale v R [2015] NSWCCA 120 Cited cited 40×
  26. Haidari v R [2015] NSWCCA 126 Cited cited 2×
  27. CLC v R [2015] NSWCCA 248 Cited cited 4×
  28. Aravena v R [2015] NSWCCA 288 Cited cited 42×
  29. Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218 Cited cited 72×
  30. R v CTG [2017] NSWCCA 163 Cited cited 27×
  31. Obeid v R [2017] NSWCCA 221 Cited cited 272×
  32. Evans v R [2017] NSWCCA 281 Cited cited 6×
  33. Chaouk v R [2017] NSWCCA 295 Applied or followed cited 9×
  34. Greenhalgh v R [2017] NSWCCA 94 Cited cited 51×
  35. AZ v R [2018] NSWCCA 294 Cited cited 8×
  36. Bray v R [2018] NSWCCA 301 Cited cited 4×
  37. Roach v R [2019] NSWCCA 160 Cited cited 31×
  38. Pell v The Queen [2020] HCA 12 Cited cited 198×
  39. Lee v R [2020] NSWCCA 244 Cited cited 24×
  40. Vaughan v R [2020] NSWCCA 3 Cited cited 33×
  41. Keen v R [2020] NSWCCA 59 Cited cited 8×
  42. Scott v R [2020] NSWCCA 81 Cited cited 41×
  43. He v Sun [2021] NSWCA 95 Cited cited 30×
  44. Xie v R [2021] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 29×
  45. Trevascus v R [2021] NSWCCA 104 Cited cited 14×
  46. Long (a pseudonym) v R [2021] NSWCCA 212 Cited cited 6×
  47. Hall v R [2021] NSWCCA 220 Cited cited 36×
  48. JT v R [2021] NSWCCA 223 Not followed
  49. Pratten v R [2021] NSWCCA 251 Cited cited 7×
  50. Noonan v R [2021] NSWCCA 35 Cited cited 18×
  51. Burke v R [2022] NSWCCA 6 Cited cited 8×
  52. Scaysbrook v R [2022] NSWCCA 69 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.