Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v McCall

[2022] NSWDC 78

District Court of NSW · 24 March 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2022: 2 citing judgments 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Pilsbury [2022] NSWDC 484 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  2. R v Tomlinson [2022] NSWDC 220 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (55)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v War Pensions Entitlement Appeal Tribunal; ex parte Bott [1933] HCA 30 Cited cited 252×
  2. Fraser Henleins Pty Ltd v Cody [1945] HCA 49 Cited cited 26×
  3. R v Herring (1956) 73 WN (NSW) 203 Cited cited 64×
  4. Fleming v White [1981] 2 NSWLR 719 Cited cited 17×
  5. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  6. Balog v Independent Commission Against Corruption [1990] HCA 28 Cited cited 56×
  7. R v Clinch (1994) 72 A Crim R 301 Cited cited 62×
  8. Hamzy v R (1994) 74 A Crim R 341 Cited cited 66×
  9. Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×
  10. Nicholas v The Queen [1998] HCA 9 Cited cited 111×
  11. R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 Cited cited 396×
  12. Weininger v The Queen [2003] HCA 14 Cited cited 242×
  13. Putland v The Queen [2004] HCA 8 Cited cited 48×
  14. Holland v R (2005) 154 A Crim R 396 Cited cited 2×
  15. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  16. R v M.A.K., R v M.S.K. [2006] NSWCCA 381 Cited cited 369×
  17. Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 601×
  18. DANIAL, Fawzieh Nona v R [2008] NSWCCA 15 Cited cited 28×
  19. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×
  20. R v Fuller [2010] NSWCCA 192 Cited cited 22×
  21. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 1,099×
  22. R v Asplund Asplund v R [2010] NSWCCA 316 Cited cited 43×
  23. R v Jarrold [2010] NSWCCA 69 Distinguished cited 35×
  24. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  25. Bahar v R [2011] WASCA 249 Cited cited 19×
  26. Devaney v R [2012] NSWCCA 285 Cited cited 54×
  27. Weinstock v Beck [2013] HCA 14 Cited cited 90×
  28. Elias v The Queen [2013] HCA 31 Cited cited 141×
  29. Magaming v The Queen [2013] HCA 40 Cited cited 60×
  30. Karim v R; Magaming v R; Bin Lahaiya v R; Bayu v R; Alomalu v R [2013] NSWCCA 23 Cited cited 19×
  31. Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2 Cited cited 358×
  32. MARTIN, Geoffrey Keith v REGINA [2014] NSWCCA 124 Cited cited 35×
  33. Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39 Cited cited 225×
  34. Dui Kol v Regina [2015] NSWCCA 150 Cited cited 7×
  35. R v Porte [2015] NSWCCA 174 Cited cited 92×
  36. Jadron v R [2015] NSWCCA 217 Cited cited 29×
  37. Adamson v R [2015] VSCA 194 Cited cited 12×
  38. Nguyen v The Queen [2016] HCA 17 Cited cited 71×
  39. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Watson [2016] VSCA 73 Cited cited 9×
  40. DPP (Cth) v Garside [2016] VSCA 74 Cited cited 21×
  41. Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144 Cited cited 203×
  42. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Beattie [2017] NSWCCA 301 Cited cited 86×
  43. Suksa-Ngacharoen v Regina [2018] NSWCCA 142 Cited cited 10×
  44. Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4 Cited cited 201×
  45. Burton v R [2020] NSWCCA 127 Cited cited 10×
  46. Small v R [2020] NSWCCA 216 Cited cited 8×
  47. Woods v R [2020] NSWCCA 219 Cited cited 10×
  48. Kannis v R [2020] NSWCCA 79 Cited cited 15×
  49. R v Hurt (No 2) [2021] ACTSC 241 Cited cited 5×
  50. Stanton v R [2021] NSWCCA 123 Cited cited 12×
  51. Lai v R [2021] NSWCCA 217 Cited cited 27×
  52. R v Delzotto [2021] NSWDC 325 Cited cited 6×
  53. R v Large [2021] NSWDC 429 Applied or followed cited 3×
  54. CDPP v Munn [2021] VCC 1038 Applied or followed
  55. Lloyd v R [2022] NSWCCA 18 Cited cited 76×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.