Pinpoint · Judgment search

Police v Liddington

[2023] NSWLC 13

Local Court of NSW · 6 February 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (17)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46 Cited cited 738×
  2. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Applied or followed cited 1,716×
  3. McAuliffe v The Queen [1995] HCA 37 Cited cited 96×
  4. Regina v Doan [2000] NSWCCA 317 Cited cited 198×
  5. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  6. R v Duncan (2007) 172 A Crim R 111 Cited cited 6×
  7. R v Robert Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102 Cited cited 504×
  8. Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49 Cited cited 741×
  9. Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Cited cited 1,170×
  10. Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144 Cited cited 203×
  11. Valentine v R [2020] NSWCCA 116 Cited cited 35×
  12. Greaves v R [2020] NSWCCA 140 Cited cited 23×
  13. Park v The Queen [2021] HCA 37 Cited cited 21×
  14. Quinn v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCA 294 Cited cited 29×
  15. Walton v ACN 004 410 833 Limited (formerly Arrium Limited) (in liquidation) [2022] HCA 3 Cited cited 17×
  16. Thurlow v R [2022] NSWCCA 20 Cited cited 7×
  17. Bresnahan v R [2022] NSWCCA 288 Cited cited 8×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.