Pinpoint · Judgment search

Preston, in the matter of Qenos Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed)

[2024] FCA 461

Federal Court of Australia · 29 April 2024 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Re Denistone Real Estate Pty Ltd [1970] 3 NSWLR 327 Cited cited 2×
  2. Re Mascot Home Furnishers Pty Ltd [1970] VR 593 Cited cited 37×
  3. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Woodings (1995) 13 WAR 189 Cited cited 5×
  4. Brash Holdings Ltd (administrators appointed) v Katile Pty Ltd [1996] 21 VR 24 Cited
  5. Bidald Consulting v Miles Special Builders; Bidald Consulting v Miles Special Builders [2005] NSWSC 1235 Cited cited 51×
  6. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Wellnora Pty Limited [2007] FCA 1234 Cited cited 17×
  7. Mentha, in the matter of Griffin Coal Mining Company Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) [2010] FCA 1469 Cited cited 56×
  8. Re Mowbray College [2012] VSC 300 Cited
  9. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Premiercorp Pty Limited (Administrators Appointed); in the matter of Premiercorp Pty Limited (Administrators Appointed) [2013] FCA 778 Cited
  10. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Midland Hwy Pty Ltd (administrators appointed); in the matter of Midland Hwy Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) [2015] FCA 1360 Cited cited 22×
  11. In the matter of Ambient Advertising Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2015] NSWSC 1079 Cited cited 16×
  12. Victoria v Goulburn Administration Services (In Liq) [2016] VSC 654 Cited cited 10×
  13. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, in the matter of ACN 154 520 199 Pty Ltd (in liq) v ACN 154 520 199 Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2017] FCA 755 Cited cited 24×
  14. Korda, in the matter of Ten Network Holdings Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2017] FCA 914 Cited cited 6×
  15. Victoria v CTM Training Solutions Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2017] VSC 47 Cited cited 8×
  16. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, in the matter of Italian Prestige Jewellery Pty Limited (in liq) ACN 116 031 022 v Italian Prestige Jewellery Pty Limited [2018] FCA 983 Cited cited 24×
  17. In the matter of Courtenay House Capital Trading Group Pty Ltd (in liq) [2021] NSWSC 256 Cited cited 6×
  18. Crosbie (administrator), in the matter of Godfreys Group Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) [2024] FCA 60 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.