Pinpoint · Judgment search

Bagster v R

[2024] NSWCCA 224

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 20 December 2024 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (25)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Williams v Smith [1960] HCA 22 Cited cited 7×
  2. Williams v Smith [1960] HCA 65 Cited
  3. Ryan v The Queen [1967] HCA 2 Cited cited 47×
  4. R v Holzer [1968] VR 481 Cited cited 6×
  5. Royall v The Queen [1991] HCA 27 Cited cited 140×
  6. Wilson v The Queen [1992] HCA 31 Cited cited 92×
  7. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  8. Regina v CORNELISSEN, R v SUTTON [2004] NSWCCA 449 Cited cited 2×
  9. R v Lavender [2005] HCA 37 Cited cited 106×
  10. Stevens v The Queen [2005] HCA 65 Cited cited 11×
  11. R v Heaney (2009) 194 A Crim R 562 Cited cited 2×
  12. R v Heaney (2009) 22 VR 164 Cited cited 2×
  13. SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13 Cited cited 428×
  14. Lane v R [2013] NSWCCA 317 Cited cited 55×
  15. Flanagan v R [2013] NSWCCA 320 Cited cited 9×
  16. R v McCarthy [2015] SASCFC 177 Cited cited 2×
  17. Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35 Cited cited 340×
  18. Lane v R [2017] NSWCCA 46 Cited cited 10×
  19. Zandipour v The Queen [2017] VSCA 179 Cited cited 2×
  20. AZ v R [2018] NSWCCA 294 Cited cited 8×
  21. Ribbon v The Queen (2019) 348 FLR 1 Cited cited 2×
  22. Ribbon v The Queen [2019] SASCFC 130 Cited cited 2×
  23. Coughlan v The Queen [2020] HCA 15 Cited cited 22×
  24. [2023] SASCA 109 Cited cited 2×
  25. AKB v R [2024] NSWCCA 169 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.