Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Buddle

[2024] NSWDC 334

District Court of NSW · 8 August 2024 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (25)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v HUYNH; R v LAM; R v TA [2000] NSWCCA 18 Cited cited 17×
  2. R v Goundar [2001] NSWCCA 198 Cited cited 21×
  3. R v M.A.K., R v M.S.K. [2006] NSWCCA 381 Cited cited 369×
  4. DOLAN v R [2010] NSWCCA 10 Cited
  5. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 1,099×
  6. EINFELD v REGINA [2010] NSWCCA 87 Cited cited 92×
  7. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  8. Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49 Cited cited 741×
  9. Sheen v R [2014] NSWCCA 42 Cited cited 5×
  10. Ryan v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 209 Cited cited 31×
  11. Luque v R [2017] NSWCCA 226 Cited cited 38×
  12. Alkanaan v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 56 Cited cited 20×
  13. Baden v R [2020] NSWCCA 23 Cited cited 22×
  14. Hall v R [2021] NSWCCA 220 Cited cited 36×
  15. Moiler v R [2021] NSWCCA 73 Cited cited 32×
  16. DH v R [2022] NSWCCA 200 Cited cited 49×
  17. KM v R [2023] NSWCCA 10 Cited cited 16×
  18. Giles-Adams v R; Preca v R [2023] NSWCCA 122 Cited cited 17×
  19. R v Eaton [2023] NSWCCA 125 Cited cited 28×
  20. Chu v R [2023] NSWCCA 13 Cited cited 7×
  21. TM v R [2023] NSWCCA 185 Cited cited 19×
  22. Pender v Rex [2023] NSWCCA 291 Cited cited 7×
  23. Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v TH [2023] NSWCCA 81 Cited cited 19×
  24. DC v R [2023] NSWCCA 82 Cited cited 20×
  25. Edquist-Wheeler v R [2024] NSWCCA 49 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.