Pinpoint · Judgment search

Pender v Rex

[2023] NSWCCA 291

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 24 November 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Cited 6

2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 6 citing judgments, 1 negative 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Edwards [2023] NSWDC 530 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  2. Moore v R [2024] NSWCCA 115 Distinguished NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  3. R v Krajnovic [2024] NSWDC 333 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  4. R v Buddle [2024] NSWDC 334 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  5. R v Andrews [2024] NSWDC 358 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  6. R v Lawrence [2024] NSWDC 485 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  7. R v WP [2024] NSWDC 544 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd [1993] HCA 15 Cited cited 493×
  2. R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 Cited cited 278×
  3. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  4. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  5. Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22 Cited cited 819×
  6. Gett v Tabet [2009] NSWCA 76 Cited cited 163×
  7. BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159 Cited cited 186×
  8. Bourke v R [2010] NSWCCA 22 Cited cited 41×
  9. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Applied or followed cited 1,670×
  10. Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Cited cited 1,170×
  11. Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38 Cited cited 287×
  12. Kelly v R [2016] NSWCCA 246 Cited cited 5×
  13. Day v R [2017] NSWCCA 192 Cited cited 14×
  14. Sharma v R [2017] NSWCCA 85 Applied or followed cited 22×
  15. R v Shortland [2018] NSWCCA 34 Cited cited 21×
  16. McDowall v R [2019] NSWCCA 29 Applied or followed cited 31×
  17. Fisher v The Queen [2021] HCASL 250 Cited
  18. Nasrallah v R [2021] NSWCCA 207 Cited cited 56×
  19. Fisher v R; R v Fisher [2021] NSWCCA 91 Applied or followed cited 24×
  20. Bektasovski v R [2022] NSWCCA 246 Applied or followed cited 18×
  21. Totaan v R [2022] NSWCCA 75 Cited cited 88×
  22. R v Eaton [2023] NSWCCA 125 Applied or followed cited 28×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.