Pinpoint · Judgment search

Arudselvan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[1999] FCA 622

Federal Court of Australia · 9 August 1999 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 8

2000: 6 citing judgments 2001: 3 citing judgments 1999 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Nefiodova v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 179 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  2. El Hejjar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 263 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Mohammed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 264 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 15× · judgment
  4. Balan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 384 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. N258/00A v MIMA [2000] FCA 993 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 12× · judgment
  6. Kheirollahpoor v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1350 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  7. Rajanayake v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 352 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Thirunavukkarasu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 551 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  9. Sarancharkh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1461 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (24)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Pettitt v Dunkley [1971] 1 NSWLR 376 Cited cited 225×
  2. Bisley Investment Corporation Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1982) 59 FLR 132 Cited cited 32×
  3. Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Wraith (1983) 48 ALR 500 Applied or followed cited 75×
  4. Our Town FM Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1987] FCA 301 Cited cited 106×
  5. Dennis Willcox Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1988] FCA 123 Cited cited 63×
  6. Re Maria Politis v Commissioner of Taxation [1988] FCA 739 Cited cited 110×
  7. Broussard v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 21 FCR 472 Cited cited 66×
  8. Rich Rivers Radio Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1989) 22 FCR 437 Cited cited 15×
  9. Commonwealth v Pharmacy Guild of Australia (1989) 91 ALR 65 Cited cited 42×
  10. Dornan v Riordan [1990] FCA 383 Cited cited 116×
  11. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×
  12. Telescourt v Commonwealth [1991] FCA 205 Cited cited 14×
  13. Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 Cited cited 185×
  14. Anderson v Australian Postal Corporation (1993) 32 ALD 138 Cited cited 3×
  15. Aerolineas Argentinas & Ors v Federal Airports Corporation [1995] FCA 1129 Distinguished cited 41×
  16. Muralidharan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 62 FCR 402 Applied or followed cited 88×
  17. Jong Kim Koe v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 14 FCR 508 Cited cited 2×
  18. Tji, Lay Kon v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs [1998] FCA 1380 Cited cited 9×
  19. Nagaratnam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 84 FCR 569 Cited cited 6×
  20. Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 247 Cited cited 170×
  21. Chopra v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 480 Applied or followed cited 13×
  22. Ahmed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 811 Overruled or disapproved cited 22×
  23. Yilan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 854 Applied or followed cited 25×
  24. Doss v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs [1999] FCA 979 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.