Pinpoint · Judgment search

N258/00A v MIMA

[2000] FCA 993

Federal Court of Australia · 26 July 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 12 indexed judgments

All Not followed 1 Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 1 Cited 9

2000: 7 citing judgments, 2 negative 2001: 4 citing judgments 2002: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Yaqub v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1092 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Indatissa v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1119 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  3. Kheirollahpoor v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1350 Not followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  4. Tour Gul v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1537 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  5. Aung v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1562 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  6. Merabishvili v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1879 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  7. Rahman v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1794 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  8. Gogoladze v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 118 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  9. Perchine v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 168 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  10. Chowdhury v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 278 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  11. Rios v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1313 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  12. Baig v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 380 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 18× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (9)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Television Capricornia Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1986) 13 FCR 511 Cited cited 26×
  2. Arudselvan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1726 Cited cited 19×
  3. Arudselvan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 622 Cited cited 9×
  4. Yilan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 854 Cited cited 25×
  5. Balan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 171 ALR 7 Cited
  6. Nefiodova v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 179 Cited cited 5×
  7. El Hejjar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 263 Cited
  8. Mohammed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 264 Cited cited 15×
  9. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845 Cited cited 231×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.