Pinpoint · Judgment search

Peniche v Hannan

[1999] FCA 915

Federal Court of Australia · 6 July 1999 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2003: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2010: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 1999 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Forsyth v United Kingdom [2003] FCA 1084 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Dragan Vasiljkovic v Minister for Justice and Customs and Ors [2006] FCA 1346 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Vasiljkovic v Honourable Brendan O'Connor [2010] FCA 1246 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 16× · judgment
  4. Pauga v Chief Executive of Queensland Corrective Services [2023] FCAFC 58 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Connell; Ex parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd [1944] HCA 42 Cited cited 253×
  2. Buck v Bavone [1976] HCA 24 Cited cited 325×
  3. R v Iorlano [1983] HCA 43 Cited cited 21×
  4. Foley v Padley [1984] HCA 50 Cited cited 49×
  5. Harris v Attorney-General (Cth) (1994) 52 FCR 386 Applied or followed cited 75×
  6. Re Rozenes; Ex parte Burd [1994] HCA 11 Cited cited 11×
  7. Public Prosecutions (Cth), Director of v Kainhofer [1995] HCA 35 Applied or followed cited 87×
  8. Flanagan, John & Ors v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police & Ors [1996] FCA 16 Applied or followed cited 45×
  9. R v Elliot [1996] HCA 21 Cited cited 19×
  10. Transport Workers' Union of Australia & Ors v Lee, Graham Meyrick [1998] FCA 756 Cited cited 36×
  11. Dutton v Republic of South Africa [1999] FCA 2 Cited cited 4×
  12. Johnson v Williams (Attorney-General) [1999] FCA 586 Cited cited 3×
  13. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.