Pinpoint · Judgment search

NAVM v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

[2004] FCA 99

Federal Court of Australia · 6 February 2004 · Official judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 9

2006: 1 citing judgment 2008: 1 citing judgment 2010: 1 citing judgment 2013: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2021: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2004 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Applicant S291 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2006] FCA 1172 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. SZLIQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1405 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  3. SZNKO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 297 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 25× · judgment
  4. Sandhu v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] FCA 842 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  5. SZTGV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 3 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 26× · judgment
  6. SZTYV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1076 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. Tran v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1126 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  8. DCP17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 290 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  9. Nguyen v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1256 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  10. CRB18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1180 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (4)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Milk Board; Ex parte Tomkins [1944] VLR 187 Cited cited 5×
  2. Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×
  3. Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30 Cited cited 630×
  4. Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26 Cited cited 943×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.