Pinpoint · Judgment search

"M" v Commission for Children and Young People (No. 2)

[2004] NSWIRComm 127

Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · 24 May 2004 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 1

2005: 1 citing judgment 2007: 1 citing judgment 2004 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. "M" v Commissioner for Children and Young People (No 3) [2005] NSWIRComm 318 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  2. ''SB'' and Commission for Children and Young People [2007] NSWIRComm 61 Applied or followed Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (8)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Postiglione (1991) 24 NSWLR 584 Cited cited 5×
  2. Hollingsworth v Commissioner of Police (No 2) (1999) 88 IR 282 Cited cited 80×
  3. A v Commission for Children & Young People (No 2) (2000) 104 IR 119 Cited cited 7×
  4. Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21 Cited cited 307×
  5. R v HELMHOUT [2001] NSWCCA 372 Applied or followed cited 19×
  6. Commission for Children and Young People v V [2002] NSWSC 949 Cited cited 496×
  7. (2003) 124 IR 237 Cited
  8. Weininger v The Queen [2003] HCA 14 Cited cited 242×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.