Pinpoint · Judgment search

Inspector Steven Nikolovski v Dennis Sewell

[2010] NSWIRComm 26

Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · 2 March 2010 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2010: 1 citing judgment 2013: 1 citing judgment 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Inspector Steven Nikolovski v Northpac Constructions Pty Ltd [2010] NSWIRComm 176 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · judgment
  2. Inspector Mason v Graham Allen Chapman & anor [2013] NSWIRComm 71 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (7)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Sukkar [2006] 172 ACrimR 151 Cited
  2. WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Robert Mayell) v D J Gleeson Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 363 Cited cited 33×
  3. SZ v The Queen (2007) 168 ACrimR 249 Cited cited 2×
  4. Inspector Braddick v Connex Sydney Pty Ltd (known as Veolia Transport Sydney Pty Ltd) [2007] NSWIRComm 208 Cited cited 5×
  5. Inspector Dimitri Barlas v C & J Carpentry & Construction Pty Ltd and Others [2009] NSWIRComm 127 Cited cited 7×
  6. Inspector Stephen Charles v Premier Precast Pty Limited [2009] NSWIRComm 136 Cited cited 4×
  7. Inspector Steven Nikolovski v Northpac Constructions Pty Limited and Anor [2009] NSWIRComm 204 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.