Pinpoint · Judgment search

Raeburne v Department of Justice and Attorney General

[2011] NSWIRComm 48

Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · 21 April 2011 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Cited 9

2012: 1 citing judgment 2019: 3 citing judgments 2020: 2 citing judgments 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 2 citing judgments 2011 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Walters v RailCorp [2012] NSWTAB 3 Cited NSWTAB · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Isabelle Dumas v Industrial Relations Secretary on behalf of the Department of Family and Community Services [2019] NSWIRComm 1018 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Zopf v Industrial Relations Secretary on behalf of the Department of Finance, Services and Innovation [2019] NSWIRComm 1046 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  4. Gaite v Commissioner of Fire and Rescue NSW [2019] NSWIRComm 1070 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Naylor v Health Secretary on behalf of Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District [2020] NSWIRComm 1051 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · judgment
  6. Bowen v City of Ryde Council (No 2) [2020] NSWIRComm 1076 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  7. Jaggi v Health Secretary in respect of the Western Sydney Local Health District [2022] NSWIRComm 1032 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  8. Romeo v Griffith City Council [2023] NSWIRComm 1015 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  9. Dey v Industrial Relations Secretary on behalf of the Department of Communities and Justice (Community Services) (No 2) [2023] NSWIRComm 1094 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (14)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Outboard World v Muir [1993] NSWIRComm 93 Cited cited 166×
  2. Little v Commissioner of Police (No.2) [2002] NSWIRComm 52 Applied or followed cited 157×
  3. Mohammed Shakiq v Boral Australia Gypsum Limited [2003] NSWIRComm 182 Cited cited 3×
  4. Blackadder v Ramsey Butchering Services Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 22 Cited cited 73×
  5. Austin v NF Importers Pty Ltd & Anor [2005] NSWIRComm 136 Cited cited 4×
  6. Plummer v Stannard Bros Launch Service Pty Limited [2005] NSWIRComm 301 Applied or followed cited 34×
  7. Austin v NF Importers Pty Ltd & Anor [2005] NSWIRComm 353 Cited cited 105×
  8. Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales (on behalf of Peter Riley) v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWIRComm 108 Applied or followed cited 66×
  9. Budlong v NCR Australia Pty Limited [2006] NSWIRComm 288 Cited cited 48×
  10. Director of PE His Agent The Director-General of The Department Of Juvenile Justice and PSA and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of NSW (On Behalf of Elvin Brian Brown) [2008] NSWIRComm 221 Cited cited 20×
  11. Toshack v Commissioner of Police [2009] NSWIRComm 31 Cited cited 31×
  12. Director General, New South Wales Department of Health v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales [2010] NSWCA 47 Cited cited 30×
  13. Raeburne v Attorney General's Department [2010] NSWIRComm 130 Cited
  14. Commissioner of Police v Alyson Reid-Frost [2010] NSWIRComm 2 Cited cited 30×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.