Supreme Court of NSW · 5 March 2012 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[2003] HCA 53 Cited cited 100×[1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×[1964] HCA 69 Cited cited 2,085×[1996] HCA 25 Cited cited 683×[1997] HCA 1 Cited cited 613×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×(1991) 33 FCR 397 Cited cited 1,469×[1994] HCA 40 Cited cited 981×[1998] HCA 27 Cited cited 537×[1949] HCA 1 Cited cited 909×[1964] HCA 69 Cited cited 2,085×[1981] HCA 39 Cited cited 623×[1997] HCA 1 Cited cited 613×[2003] HCA 22 Cited cited 1,476×[1979] HCA 9 Cited cited 595×(1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Cited cited 804×[1993] HCA 78 Cited cited 520×[1999] HCA 3 Cited cited 463×[2005] NSWCA 290 Cited cited 32×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×(1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Cited cited 804×[1994] HCA 40 Cited cited 981×[1996] HCA 25 Cited cited 683×(1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Cited cited 489×[2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[2010] NSWSC 1143 Cited cited 5×[2003] HCA 53 Cited cited 100×[1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×[1964] HCA 69 Cited cited 2,085×[1996] HCA 25 Cited cited 683×[2003] HCA 22 Cited cited 1,476×[2005] NSWCA 290 Cited cited 32×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×(1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Cited cited 804×[1994] HCA 40 Cited cited 981×[2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×[2009] NSWCA 408 Cited cited 66×[1936] HCA 40 Applied or followed cited 4,342×[1992] HCA 15 Cited cited 193×(1993) 32 NSWLR 524 Cited cited 127×[2006] NSWCA 41 Cited cited 218×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[2003] HCA 53
Cited cited 100× [2005] NSWCA 290
Cited cited 32× [2010] NSWSC 1143
Cited cited 5× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.