Pinpoint · Judgment search

ALS v R

[2013] NSWCCA 63

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 25 March 2013 · Official judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Cited 6

2015: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2013 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. ALS v R [2015] NSWCCA 70 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  2. DV v R [2017] NSWCCA 276 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  3. WX v R [2020] NSWCCA 142 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  4. EC (a pseudonym) v R [2023] NSWCCA 66 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  5. AB v R [2023] NSWCCA 165 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  6. Hayne v R [2024] NSWCCA 97 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (16)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Ratten v The Queen [1974] HCA 35 Cited cited 163×
  2. Director of Public Prosecutions (Nauru) v Fowler [1984] HCA 48 Cited cited 53×
  3. Gallagher v The Queen [1986] HCA 26 Applied or followed cited 144×
  4. Morris v The Queen [1987] HCA 50 Cited cited 128×
  5. Mickelberg v The Queen [1989] HCA 35 Applied or followed cited 187×
  6. Jiminez v The Queen [1992] HCA 14 Cited cited 73×
  7. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  8. R v Ion (1996) 89 A Crim R 81 Cited cited 19×
  9. REGINA v James SALEAM [1999] NSWCCA 86 Cited cited 258×
  10. Spies v The Queen [2000] HCA 43 Cited cited 101×
  11. R v Thomas (No 3) [2006] VSCA 300 Cited cited 10×
  12. Keir v R [2007] NSWCCA 149 Cited cited 12×
  13. SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13 Cited cited 428×
  14. MRW v R [2011] NSWCCA 260 Cited cited 65×
  15. Gilham v R [2012] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 51×
  16. Steadman v R (No 1) [2013] NSWCCA 55 Cited cited 6×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.