Pinpoint · Judgment search

Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd

[2014] FCAFC 171

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 12 December 2014 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 9

2015: 3 citing judgments 2016: 2 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2019: 2 citing judgments 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Tran v Pu [2015] FCA 97 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  2. Shaw v Australian Pump Industries Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 547 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  3. Guss v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 841 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  4. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2016] FCA 575 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  5. Investec Australia Finance Pty Limited v Naude [2016] FCA 731 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  6. Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 88 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 21× · judgment
  7. Royal v Nazloomian, in the matter of Royal [2019] FCA 555 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  8. Shaw v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy Vic 1697/14/1 of Australian Financial Security Authority (No 2) [2019] FCA 1574 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  9. Alhalek v Quintiliani trading as Kells Lawyers [2020] FCA 1272 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  10. Shaw v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Australian Financial Security Authority (No 3) [2021] FCA 1569 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  11. Shaw v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Australian Financial Security Authority [2022] FCA 775 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (10)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. CDJ v VAJ [1998] HCA 67 Cited cited 378×
  2. Freeman v National Australia Bank Limited [2003] FCAFC 200 Applied or followed cited 25×
  3. NASB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 24 Cited cited 51×
  4. Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd [2011] VSCA 55 Cited cited 30×
  5. Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd [2013] FCCA 1627 Cited cited 9×
  6. Yarranova Pty Ltd v Shaw [2014] FCA 403 Cited cited 3×
  7. Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 557 Cited cited 7×
  8. Yarranova Pty Ltd v Shaw (No 2) [2014] FCA 616 Cited cited 17×
  9. Arifin v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2014] FCAFC 61 Cited cited 9×
  10. Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd [2014] VSCA 48 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.