Pinpoint · Judgment search

Sekigawa v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

[2016] FCA 127 ; (2016) 237 FCR 276 ; [2016] 237 FCR 276

Federal Court of Australia · 22 February 2016 · Official judgment

Cited by 18 indexed judgments

All Cited 18

2016: 5 citing judgments 2017: 2 citing judgments 2018: 4 citing judgments 2019: 2 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 3 citing judgments 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 30 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 68× · judgment
  2. Lavin v Toppi [2016] FCA 801 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Fewin Pty Limited v Prentice [2016] FCA 1038 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  4. AOT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1085 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  5. Siva v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1299 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. Syed v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 887 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. Coady v Yachting Victoria [2017] FCA 1290 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  8. Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 186 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  9. Rahman v Lombe [2018] FCA 457 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  10. BGW16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1244 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  11. Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1909 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  12. FHO17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 242 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. APC16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 847 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  14. Bhatt v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 1490 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  15. EPE19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 170 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  16. Cappello v Homebuilding Pty Ltd (formerly known as Hammond & Simonds NSW Pty Ltd) [2024] FCA 413 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  17. Tulett v Yourtown Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 513 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  18. Hamilton v Meta Platforms, Inc (Leave to appeal stay and costs orders) [2024] FCA 1078 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (7)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. Creditors of Antal-Air Pty Ltd (ACN 007 213 738) v Antal-Air Pty Ltd (Administrator Appointed) (ACN 007 213 738) & Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2004] FCAFC 303 Cited cited 11×
  3. SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 26 Cited cited 615×
  4. Rawson Finances Pty Limited v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 139 Cited cited 89×
  5. SZRMQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 142 Cited cited 59×
  6. Mulligan v Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 130 Applied or followed cited 16×
  7. Sekigawa v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 815 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.