Pinpoint · Judgment search

Lin v R; Ng v R

[2016] NSWCCA 200

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 12 September 2016 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2017: 1 citing judgment 2019: 2 citing judgments 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha [2017] FCA 876 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  2. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [2019] FCA 1170 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  3. Heng v R [2019] NSWCCA 317 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 Cited cited 236×
  2. R v Gallagher (1991) 53 A Crim R 248 Cited cited 14×
  3. R v Studenikin [2004] NSWCCA 164 Cited cited 36×
  4. R v C.A.S. [2005] NSWCCA 192 Cited cited 2×
  5. Mauceri v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 262 Cited
  6. SUKKAR Paul Tony v R [2007] NSWCCA 298 Cited cited 5×
  7. BERRY v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (CTH); PHAPAKDY v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (CTH) [2008] NSWCCA 20 Cited
  8. NP v R [2008] NSWCCA 205 Cited cited 5×
  9. CHAN, LO and NGUYEN v REGINA [2010] NSWCCA 153 Cited cited 33×
  10. R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238 Cited cited 135×
  11. R v Bakhos Jalalaty [2010] NSWSC 1561 Cited cited 3×
  12. R v Moore [2012] NSWCCA 3 Cited cited 6×
  13. R v Ehrlich [2012] NSWCCA 38 Cited cited 32×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.