Pinpoint · Judgment search

Hart v Attorney-General for New South Wales

[2016] NSWCCA 71

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 2 May 2016 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Cited 9

2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2020: 5 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Lazarus v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2017] NSWCA 37 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 36× · judgment
  2. Huang v R [2018] NSWCCA 57 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 22× · judgment
  3. Bae v R [2020] NSWCCA 35 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 38× · judgment
  4. Hijazi v R [2020] NSWCCA 97 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  5. R v Croke [2020] NSWDC 460 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  6. Kaurasi v R (Cth) [2020] NSWCCA 253 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 7× · judgment
  7. Lonsdale v R [2020] NSWCCA 267 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  8. Croke v R [2021] NSWCCA 249 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  9. Garcia v R [2022] NSWCCA 172 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (12)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×
  2. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S APPLICATION UNDER s37 OF THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURE) ACT 1999 NO 1 OF 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Cited cited 871×
  3. REGINA v THOMPSON [2005] NSWCCA 340 Cited cited 33×
  4. R v Van Hong Pham [2005] NSWCCA 94 Cited cited 77×
  5. New South Wales Bar Association v Hart [2006] NSWADT 97 Cited
  6. The Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Hart [2009] NSWADT 252 Cited
  7. Tsakonas v R [2009] NSWCCA 258 Cited cited 11×
  8. R v Nykolyn [2012] NSWCCA 219 Cited cited 52×
  9. Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 Cited cited 712×
  10. Hampton v R [2014] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 23×
  11. Independent Commission Against Corruption v Cunneen [2015] HCA 14 Cited cited 112×
  12. Duncan v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2015] HCA 32 Cited cited 13×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.