Federal Court of Australia · 30 November 2017 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[1975] AC 295 Cited cited 122×(1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×[2006] HCA 63 Cited cited 914×[1975] AC 295 Cited cited 122×[1984] FCA 57 Cited cited 378×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×(1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×[1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×[1986] HCA 40 Applied or followed cited 2,191×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[2003] HCA 60 Cited cited 164×[2007] FCAFC 162 Cited cited 31×[2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[2001] FCA 919 Cited cited 121×[1986] HCA 54 Applied or followed cited 682×[1999] FCA 247 Cited cited 170×[2001] HCA 22 Cited cited 479×[2001] FCA 274 Cited cited 128×[2004] FCAFC 123 Cited cited 223×[1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×[2003] HCA 2 Applied or followed cited 1,335×[2006] HCA 63 Cited cited 914×[1984] FCA 57 Cited cited 378×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×(1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×[1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×[2006] FCAFC 2 Cited cited 221×[1986] HCA 54 Cited cited 682×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2003] HCA 6 Cited cited 918×[2007] HCA 26 Cited cited 615×[1986] HCA 33 Cited cited 1,127×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2015] FCA 1002 Cited cited 4×[1986] HCA 33 Cited cited 1,127×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2001] FCA 1833 Cited cited 659×[1982] HCA 24 Cited cited 1,322×[1986] HCA 33 Applied or followed cited 1,127×[1995] HCA 24 Cited cited 906×[1998] HCA 11 Cited cited 2,226×[2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[2003] FCAFC 184 Cited cited 654×[2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×[2001] FCA 1802 Cited cited 279×[2002] FCAFC 228 Cited cited 289×[2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×[2006] HCA 63 Cited cited 914×[1984] FCA 57 Cited cited 378×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×(1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×[1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×[2015] FCCA 103 Cited cited 2×[2016] FCCA 691 Cited cited 1×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[1975] AC 295
Cited cited 122× (1994) 49 FCR 576
Cited cited 452× [2006] HCA 63
Cited cited 914× [2007] FCAFC 162
Cited cited 31× [2015] FCA 1002
Cited cited 4× [2015] FCCA 103
Cited cited 2× [2016] FCCA 691
Cited Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.