Pinpoint · Judgment search

SZTKE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

[2015] FCA 1002

Federal Court of Australia · 10 September 2015 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2017: 2 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2015 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. CMV15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1422 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. ABP16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1419 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. CNW15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 849 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. CMF16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1860 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (23)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. O'Brien v Komesaroff [1982] HCA 33 Cited cited 408×
  2. Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33 Cited cited 1,127×
  3. Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×
  4. A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1997] HCA 4 Cited cited 414×
  5. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×
  6. Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833 Cited cited 659×
  7. Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 Cited cited 654×
  8. VAAC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 74 Cited cited 120×
  9. Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×
  10. SLMB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 129 Cited cited 118×
  11. VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158 Cited cited 600×
  12. Applicant NAFF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] HCA 62 Cited cited 128×
  13. VAAD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 117 Cited cited 119×
  14. SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63 Cited cited 914×
  15. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNWC [2010] FCAFC 157 Cited cited 9×
  16. SZSGA v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] FCA 774 Cited cited 43×
  17. MZZUO v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2014] FCA 1267 Cited cited 2×
  18. SZTBW v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1277 Distinguished cited 2×
  19. WZAPN v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 947 Cited cited 46×
  20. SZTEQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 39 Overruled or disapproved cited 25×
  21. BZAFM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 41 Overruled or disapproved cited 8×
  22. SZTKE v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 103 Cited cited 2×
  23. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZAPN [2015] HCA 22 Cited cited 75×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.