Pinpoint · Judgment search

Construction Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Doueihi (No 4)

[2017] NSWSC 684

Supreme Court of NSW · 31 May 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2018: 1 citing judgment 2017 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Construction Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Doueihi (No 5) [2018] NSWSC 294 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (12)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. JAG Investment Pty Ltd v Strati [1981] 2 NSWLR 600 Cited cited 22×
  2. AUSTRALIAN HARDBOARDS LIMITED v HUDSON INVESTMENT GROUP LIMITED [2007] NSWCA 104 Cited cited 73×
  3. Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd v Vella (2011) 16 BPR 30 Cited cited 22×
  4. Taluja v Australian International Academy of Education Ltd [2011] NSWCA 416 Cited cited 10×
  5. Simmons v New South Wales Trustee and Guardian (2014) 17 BPR 33 Cited cited 44×
  6. Sidhu v Van Dyke [2014] HCA 19 Cited cited 161×
  7. Construction Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Doueihi & 4 Ors [2014] NSWSC 1717 Cited cited 14×
  8. Construction Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Doueihi & 4 Ors (No. 3) [2015] NSWSC 1850 Cited cited 2×
  9. Doueihi v Construction Technologies Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 105 Cited cited 34×
  10. Despot v Registrar General of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 5 Cited cited 9×
  11. R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 24) [2016] NSWSC 105 Cited cited 7×
  12. Nadinic v Drinkwater [2017] NSWCA 114 Cited cited 47×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.