Pinpoint · Judgment search

FRO18 v Minister for Home Affairs

[2018] FCA 1657

Federal Court of Australia · 2 November 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (21)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Cited cited 802×
  2. Gallo v Dawson [1990] HCA 30 Cited cited 510×
  3. Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×
  4. Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×
  5. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  6. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam [1999] FCA 719 Cited cited 297×
  7. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×
  8. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30 Cited cited 648×
  9. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6 Cited cited 918×
  10. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16 Cited cited 1,026×
  11. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Cited cited 1,516×
  12. WZATH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 969 Applied or followed cited 18×
  13. WZATH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCCA 612 Applied or followed cited 16×
  14. MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1391 Cited cited 230×
  15. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH [2015] HCA 40 Cited cited 221×
  16. WZAVW v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 760 Applied or followed cited 50×
  17. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11 Cited cited 478×
  18. MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 110 Cited cited 139×
  19. Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107 Cited cited 330×
  20. BCR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 96 Cited cited 129×
  21. Guo v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 34 Cited cited 37×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.