Pinpoint · Judgment search

Blundell v R

[2019] NSWCCA 3 ; (2019) 279 A Crim R 302 ; (2019) 279 A Crim R 372

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 1 February 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 8 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 1 Cited 6

2019: 3 citing judgments, 1 negative 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 2 citing judgments 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Le; R v Loeung [2019] NSWSC 632 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Ng v R [2019] NSWCCA 172 Distinguished NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  3. Carlyle-Watson v R [2019] NSWCCA 226 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Alameddine v R [2020] NSWCCA 232 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  5. Coburn (NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment) v Cool-Off Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLC 6 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment
  6. Danishyar v R; R v Danishyar [2023] NSWCCA 300 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  7. Batak v R [2024] NSWCCA 66 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  8. R v Liu [2024] NSWDC 321 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (53)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Coney (1882) 8 QBD 534 Cited cited 10×
  2. (1921) 1 KB 509 Cited
  3. R v Russell [1933] VLR 59 Cited cited 17×
  4. R v Croft [1944] KB 295 Cited
  5. Johnson v Youden [1950] 1 KB 544 Cited cited 19×
  6. (1951) 1 KB 814 Cited
  7. [1957] 2 QB 664 Cited
  8. (1963) 3 WLR 677 Cited cited 3×
  9. R v Allan [1963] 3 WLR 677 Cited
  10. R v Allan [1965] 1 QB 130 Cited cited 2×
  11. [1966] 2 Q. B. 110 Cited
  12. (1970) 2 QB 54 Cited cited 2×
  13. R v Robert Millar (Contractors) Pty Ltd [1970] 1 All ER 577 Cited
  14. R v Robert Millar (Contractors) Ltd [1970] 2 QB 54 Cited cited 4×
  15. R v Clarkson [1971] 3 All ER 344 Cited cited 4×
  16. R v Clarkson [1971] WLR 1402 Cited cited 2×
  17. [1975] 1 QB 773 Cited cited 2×
  18. [1975] EWCA Crim 1 Cited
  19. R v Harding [1976] VR 129 Cited
  20. R v Johns [1978] 1 NSWLR 282 Applied or followed cited 12×
  21. Director of Public Prosecutions (Northern Ireland) v Maxwell [1978] 3 All ER 1140 Cited cited 7×
  22. Johns v The Queen [1980] HCA 3 Cited cited 38×
  23. (1983) 3 WLR 845 Cited
  24. [1983] AC 566 Cited
  25. (1984) 1 All ER 277 Cited
  26. Attorney General v Able [1984] QB 795 Cited cited 2×
  27. Giorgianni v The Queen [1985] HCA 29 Cited cited 281×
  28. R v Calhaem [1985] QB 808 Cited
  29. King v The Queen [1986] HCA 59 Cited cited 71×
  30. R v Tietie (1988) 34 A Crim R 438 Cited cited 5×
  31. Bruce v Williams (1989) 46 A Crim R 122 Cited cited 6×
  32. R v Ancutta (1990) 49 A Crim R 307 Cited cited 4×
  33. R v Stokes and Difford (1990) 51 A Crim R 25 Cited cited 45×
  34. McAuliffe v The Queen [1995] HCA 37 Cited cited 96×
  35. Osland v The Queen [1998] HCA 75 Cited cited 129×
  36. R v Phan [2001] NSWCCA 29 Cited cited 32×
  37. The Queen v Chai [2002] HCA 12 Cited cited 26×
  38. R v Lam (Ruling No 20) [2005] VSC 294 Cited
  39. Clayton v The Queen [2006] HCA 58 Cited cited 25×
  40. R v Lam [2008] VSCA 109 Cited cited 2×
  41. Likiardopoulos v R [2010] VSCA 344 Cited cited 6×
  42. ARS v R [2011] NSWCCA 266 Cited cited 104×
  43. R v Mendez [2011] QB 876 Cited
  44. Likiardopoulos v The Queen [2012] HCA 37 Cited cited 27×
  45. R v Stringer [2012] QB 160 Cited
  46. Miller v The Queen [2016] HCA 30 Cited cited 34×
  47. Tierney v R [2016] NSWCCA 144 Cited cited 3×
  48. Hadchiti v R [2016] NSWCCA 63 Cited cited 19×
  49. R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 Cited cited 11×
  50. The Queen v Dookheea [2017] HCA 36 Cited cited 24×
  51. Obeid v R [2017] NSWCCA 221 Cited cited 272×
  52. Greenhalgh v R [2017] NSWCCA 94 Cited cited 51×
  53. R v Spiteri-Ahern; R v Barber; R v Zraika (No 11) [2017] NSWSC 1820 Cited cited 9×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.