Pinpoint · Judgment search

SafeWork NSW v Aptec Constructions Pty Limited

[2019] NSWDC 229

District Court of NSW · 7 June 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Sandell v Porter [1966] HCA 28 Cited cited 193×
  2. Veen v R (No. 2) (1998) 164 CLR 465 Cited cited 123×
  3. CDJ v VAJ [1998] HCA 67 Cited cited 378×
  4. Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71 Cited cited 775×
  5. WorkCover Authority of NSW (Inspector Carmody) v Consolidated Constructions Pty Limited (2001) 109 IR 316 Cited cited 90×
  6. WorkCover Authority of NSW (Inspector Carmody) v Consolidated Constructions Pty Limited [2001] NSWIR Comm 263 Cited cited 27×
  7. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  8. Regina v Darrell Terry McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242 Cited cited 487×
  9. Inspector Howard v Baulderstone Hornibrook Pty Limited [2009] NSWIR Comm 92 Cited cited 6×
  10. R v Wilkinson (No. 5) [2009] NSWSC 432 Cited cited 187×
  11. JIMMY v REGINA [2010] NSWCCA 60 Cited cited 187×
  12. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  13. Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49 Cited cited 741×
  14. BW v R [2011] NSWCCA 176 Cited cited 162×
  15. DPP v Gregory [2011] VSCA 145 Cited cited 58×
  16. Mahdi Jahandideh v R [2014] NSWCCA 178 Cited cited 201×
  17. Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd;; Attorney General for New South Wales v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCCA 96 Cited cited 243×
  18. Unity Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2018] NSWCCA 266 Cited cited 132×
  19. SafeWork NSW v Ru Dong Li [2018] NSWDC 189 Cited cited 8×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.