Pinpoint · Judgment search

Du Bray v ACW

[2020] FCA 1142

Federal Court of Australia · 3 August 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Cited 11

2020: 2 citing judgments 2021: 5 citing judgments 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 2 citing judgments 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Kovacic v A&S Powersellers Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1406 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Du Bray v ACW [2020] FCA 1680 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  3. Du Bray v ACW [2021] FCAFC 103 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Chang v Haughton, in the matter of Haughton [2021] FCA 765 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Chang v Haughton, in the matter of Haughton (No 2) [2021] FCA 998 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  6. The Owners - Strata Plan No. 20347 v Saha [2021] FCA 961 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  7. Ritson v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2021] FCAFC 208 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 7× · judgment
  8. Remta v Baker (Executrix) [2022] FCA 1485 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  9. Ogbonna, in the matter of Ogbonna [2023] FCA 1334 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  10. Haughton v Shanahan (No 2) [2024] FCA 350 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  11. Canstruct Pty Ltd v Project Sea Dragon Pty Ltd (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) (No 5) [2024] FCA 479 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Simon v Vincent J O'Gorman Pty Ltd [1979] FCA 75 Cited cited 27×
  2. BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt [1980] 1 NSWLR 496 Cited cited 17×
  3. Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Cited cited 536×
  4. Re Cirillo; Ex parte Commissioner of Taxation [1992] FCA 408 Cited cited 6×
  5. Daly v Watson [1994] FCA 361 Cited cited 11×
  6. Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1996] HCA 3 Cited cited 75×
  7. Damberg v Damberg & Ors [2001] NSWCA 87 Cited cited 107×
  8. Pattison v Hadjimouratis [2006] FCAFC 153 Cited cited 32×
  9. De Robillard v Carver [2007] FCAFC 73 Cited cited 30×
  10. Watts, in the matter of Watts [2011] FCA 1185 Applied or followed cited 7×
  11. Endresz v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2014] FCA 1139 Cited cited 21×
  12. Culleton v Balwyn Nominees Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 8 Cited cited 32×
  13. Mehajer v Weston (Trustee), in the matter of Mehajer [2018] FCA 608 Cited cited 8×
  14. Dimitriou v Pineview Property Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 2123 Cited cited 2×
  15. ACW v Du Bray (No 2) [2020] FCA 994 Cited cited 6×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.