Pinpoint · Judgment search

Kabir v R

[2020] NSWCCA 139

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 8 July 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Cited 6

2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 3 citing judgments 2022: 2 citing judgments 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v WEAVER [2020] NSWDC 556 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Hildebrand v R [2021] NSWCCA 9 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  3. Pham v R [2021] NSWCCA 234 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  4. Dale v R [2021] NSWCCA 320 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  5. Natural Resources Access Regulator v Tony Thompson [2022] NSWLEC 48 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 9× · judgment
  6. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Joyce [2022] FCA 1423 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (39)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Ex parte Gleeson [1907] VLR 368 Cited cited 6×
  2. Newmarch v Atkinson [1918] HCA 53 Cited cited 3×
  3. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  4. Ward v Williams [1955] HCA 4 Cited cited 107×
  5. Finance Facilities Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1971] HCA 12 Cited cited 118×
  6. Lamb v Moss (1983) 49 ALR 533 Cited cited 50×
  7. R v Irusta [2000] NSWCCA 391 Cited cited 9×
  8. Regina v Kennedy [2000] NSWCCA 527 Cited cited 53×
  9. Regina v Capper [2000] NSWCCA 63 Cited cited 9×
  10. R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 Cited cited 396×
  11. Regina v Togias [2001] NSWCCA 522 Cited cited 65×
  12. R v Hinton [2002] NSWCCA 405 Cited cited 40×
  13. R v Felton [2002] NSWCCA 443 Cited cited 12×
  14. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S APPLICATION UNDER s37 OF THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURE) ACT 1999 NO 1 OF 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Cited cited 871×
  15. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6 Cited cited 918×
  16. R v Lewis [2003] NSWCCA 332 Cited cited 2×
  17. Regina v Daniel Clifford Brandt [2004] NSWCCA 3 Cited cited 6×
  18. CSR Limited v Eddy [2005] HCA 64 Cited cited 146×
  19. O'NEIL-SHAW v THE QUEEN [2010] NSWCCA 42 Cited cited 37×
  20. Milne v R [2012] NSWCCA 24 Cited cited 12×
  21. R v Calcutt [2012] NSWCCA 40 Cited cited 14×
  22. Assistant Commissioner Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 7 Cited cited 156×
  23. Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Cited cited 164×
  24. R v Michel NAHLOUS [2013] NSWCCA 90 Cited cited 22×
  25. John Wayne TSIAKAS v R [2015] NSWCCA 187 Cited cited 35×
  26. Zhao v R [2016] NSWCCA 179 Cited cited 17×
  27. Jung v R [2017] NSWCCA 24 Cited cited 25×
  28. Woodward v R [2017] NSWCCA 44 Cited cited 21×
  29. Vaiusu v R [2017] NSWCCA 71 Cited cited 44×
  30. Newman v R [2018] NSWCCA 208 Cited cited 14×
  31. Brown v R [2018] NSWCCA 257 Cited cited 7×
  32. Singh v R [2018] NSWCCA 60 Cited cited 20×
  33. R v Kabir [2018] NSWDC 495 Cited
  34. Spence v Queensland [2019] HCA 15 Cited cited 31×
  35. HT v The Queen [2019] HCA 40 Cited cited 53×
  36. Purves v R [2019] NSWCCA 227 Cited cited 2×
  37. R v Khan (No 11) [2019] NSWSC 594 Cited cited 5×
  38. LS v R [2020] NSWCCA 27 Cited cited 7×
  39. R v Betka [2020] NSWSC 77 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.