Pinpoint · Judgment search

EGW17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs

[2021] FCA 1177

Federal Court of Australia · 29 September 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2022: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. AVJ17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1056 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (34)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] EWCA Civ 1 Cited cited 715×
  2. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  3. Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×
  4. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  5. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×
  6. Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26 Cited cited 943×
  7. NAHI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 Cited cited 358×
  8. NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263 Cited cited 637×
  9. Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1 Cited cited 313×
  10. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS [2013] FCAFC 114 Cited cited 248×
  11. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Cited cited 1,516×
  12. SZTMD v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 150 Cited cited 47×
  13. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZUXN [2016] FCA 516 Cited cited 132×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11 Cited cited 478×
  15. CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146 Cited cited 243×
  16. Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107 Cited cited 330×
  17. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v AMA16 [2017] FCAFC 136 Cited cited 50×
  18. Gill v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 51 Cited cited 52×
  19. SZUEP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 94 Cited cited 9×
  20. BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 114 Cited cited 43×
  21. Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116 Cited cited 132×
  22. Minister for Home Affairs v HSKJ [2018] FCAFC 217 Cited cited 54×
  23. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BHA17 [2018] FCAFC 68 Cited cited 64×
  24. BDI17 v Minister for Immigration [2018] FCCA 2162 Cited cited 2×
  25. Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16 Cited cited 326×
  26. SYLN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1986 Cited cited 14×
  27. BYA17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 44 Cited cited 23×
  28. EGW17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCCA 653 Cited
  29. Plaintiff M47/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] HCA 17 Cited cited 41×
  30. BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34 Cited cited 152×
  31. Chang v Neill [2019] VSCA 151 Cited cited 7×
  32. EGY18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 796 Cited cited 4×
  33. GBV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 17 Cited cited 78×
  34. SZTMD v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2105] FCA 150 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.