Pinpoint · Judgment search

Taylor-Joycey v R

[2021] NSWCCA 29

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 10 March 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Rahman v R [2021] NSWCCA 290 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Ward v R [2022] NSWCCA 271 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×
  2. Petty v The Queen [1991] HCA 34 Cited cited 48×
  3. R v Reeves (1992) 29 NSWLR 109 Cited cited 26×
  4. Edwards v The Queen [1993] HCA 63 Cited cited 260×
  5. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  6. Savvas v The Queen [1995] HCA 29 Cited cited 92×
  7. R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 Cited cited 278×
  8. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×
  9. Cheung v The Queen [2001] HCA 67 Cited cited 222×
  10. Dyers v The Queen [2002] HCA 45 Cited cited 94×
  11. MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53 Cited cited 513×
  12. JJT v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 283 Cited cited 5×
  13. Chi Thanh Cao v R [2006] NSWCCA 89 Cited cited 6×
  14. Mahmood v State of Western Australia [2008] HCA 1 Cited cited 76×
  15. DOE v R [2008] NSWCCA 203 Cited cited 13×
  16. Louizos v R, R v Louizos [2009] NSWCCA 71 Cited cited 28×
  17. SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13 Cited cited 428×
  18. Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35 Cited cited 340×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.