Pinpoint · Judgment search

Colagrande v Kim

[2022] FCA 409

Federal Court of Australia · 21 April 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Colagrande v Kim (No 2) [2022] FCA 659 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Callan v Chawk [2023] FCA 898 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  3. Callan v Chawk (Costs) [2023] FCA 1198 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  4. Selkirk v Wyatt [2024] FCAFC 48 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 12 Cited cited 134×
  2. Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1993] HCA 31 Cited cited 196×
  3. Crampton v Nugawela [1996] NSWSC 651 Cited cited 89×
  4. Cornwall v Rowan [2004] SASC 384 Cited cited 17×
  5. Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2015] FCA 652 Cited cited 60×
  6. Al Muderis v Duncan (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 726 Cited cited 12×
  7. Faruqi v Latham [2018] FCA 1328 Cited cited 13×
  8. Bauer Media Pty Ltd v Wilson (No 2) [2018] VSCA 154 Cited cited 36×
  9. Rush v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 9) [2019] FCA 1383 Cited cited 13×
  10. Tavakoli v Imisides (No 4) [2019] NSWSC 717 Cited cited 8×
  11. Webster v Brewer (No 3) [2020] FCA 1343 Cited cited 9×
  12. Hayson v The Age Company Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 361 Cited cited 10×
  13. Nationwide News Pty Limited v Rush [2020] FCAFC 115 Cited cited 37×
  14. Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd v Wagner [2020] QCA 221 Cited cited 8×
  15. Tribe v Simmons (No 2) [2021] FCA 1164 Cited cited 5×
  16. Stead v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 15 Cited cited 29×
  17. Nettle v Cruse [2021] FCA 935 Cited cited 4×
  18. Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 12) [2022] FCA 110 Cited cited 5×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.