Pinpoint · Judgment search

Faruqi v Latham

[2018] FCA 1328

Federal Court of Australia · 30 August 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 13 indexed judgments

All Cited 13

2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 4 citing judgments 2022: 3 citing judgments 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm [2018] FCA 1688 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  2. Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Chau Chak Wing [2019] FCAFC 125 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 63× · judgment
  3. Shaw v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Australian Financial Security Authority (No 2) [2020] FCA 1575 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Parke v Rubenstein (No 2) [2021] FCA 107 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  5. Webb v Commonwealth of Australia [2021] FCA 1215 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  6. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v NQCranes Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1270 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  7. Joy v UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Limited [2021] FCA 1282 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  8. KTC v David [2022] FCAFC 60 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 25× · judgment
  9. Colagrande v Kim [2022] FCA 409 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  10. Murdoch v Private Media Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1275 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  11. Hillier v Martin (No 18) [2023] FCA 894 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  12. Blaylock-Rayner v Seven Network (Operations) Limited [2023] FCA 1026 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  13. Selkirk v Wyatt [2024] FCAFC 48 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (50)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Hickinbotham v Leach (1842) 152 ER 510 Cited cited 4×
  2. Scott v Sampson (1882) 8 QBD 491 Cited cited 20×
  3. Zierenberg v Labouchere [1893] 2 QB 183 Cited cited 15×
  4. Wootton v Sievier [1913] 3 KB 499 Cited cited 19×
  5. Howden v Truth & Sportsman Ltd [1937] HCA 74 Cited cited 37×
  6. Plato Films Ltd v Speidel [1961] AC 1090 Cited cited 63×
  7. Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234 Cited cited 148×
  8. Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371 Cited cited 50×
  9. Goody v Odhams Press Ltd [1967] 1 QB 333 Cited cited 23×
  10. Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd [1971] 2 All ER 1156 Cited cited 17×
  11. Morosi v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1977] 2 NSWLR 749 Cited cited 78×
  12. Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,021×
  13. Hughes v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1985) 3 NSWLR 504 Cited cited 20×
  14. Trade Practices Commission v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1990] FCA 23 Cited cited 31×
  15. Trade Practices Commission v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 628 Cited cited 37×
  16. Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1994] FCA 636 Cited cited 30×
  17. J C Techforce Pty Ltd & Anor v Pearce, Wayne & Ors [1996] FCA 599 Cited cited 16×
  18. The Council for the City of the Gold Coast v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd & Ors [1998] FCA 791 Cited cited 32×
  19. Burstein v Times Newspapers Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 338 Cited cited 44×
  20. Agar v Hyde [2000] HCA 41 Cited cited 526×
  21. Berezovsky v Forbes [2001] EWCA Civ 1251 Cited cited 17×
  22. O'Hagan v Nationwide News P/L [2001] NSWCA 302 Cited cited 19×
  23. Australian Broadcasting Corporation v McBride [2001] NSWCA 322 Cited cited 30×
  24. Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56 Cited cited 193×
  25. Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL [2003] EWCA Civ 1694 Cited cited 14×
  26. Shelton v National Roads and Motorists Association Ltd [2004] FCA 1393 Cited cited 128×
  27. Nationwide News Pty Limited v William El-Azzi [2004] NSWCA 382 Cited cited 5×
  28. Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2004] QCA 135 Cited cited 7×
  29. Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 52 Cited cited 162×
  30. Cavill Business Solutions Pty Ltd v Jackson [2005] WASC 138 Cited cited 5×
  31. Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck [2007] 1 SLR 453 Cited
  32. John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Hitchcock [2007] NSWCA 364 Cited cited 58×
  33. Spiteri v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 905 Cited cited 40×
  34. Radisich v McDonald [2010] FCA 762 Cited cited 23×
  35. Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Mahommed [2010] NSWCA 335 Cited cited 63×
  36. Fair Work Ombudsman v Eastern Colour Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 803 Cited cited 41×
  37. Ashcroft v Foley [2012] EWCA Civ 423 Cited cited 5×
  38. Fuller v Toms [2012] FCA 27 Cited cited 27×
  39. Polar Aviation Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2012] FCAFC 97 Cited cited 76×
  40. Crosby v Kelly [2013] FCA 1343 Cited cited 17×
  41. Corby v Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 227 Cited cited 80×
  42. Brooks v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1331 Cited cited 17×
  43. [2015] NZHC 400 Cited
  44. Khan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] WASC 400 Cited cited 4×
  45. Goodfellow v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2017] FCA 1152 Doubted cited 18×
  46. Murphy v Nationwide News Pty Limited [2017] FCA 603 Doubted cited 3×
  47. Murphy v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2017] FCA 781 Cited cited 10×
  48. Tucev v Commonwealth of Australia (as represented by the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development) [2017] FCAFC 19 Cited
  49. Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 357 Cited cited 48×
  50. Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 550 Cited cited 35×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.