Pinpoint · Judgment search

Ngatoko v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs

[2023] FCA 1165

Federal Court of Australia · 29 September 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2023: 1 citing judgment 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Ngatoko v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2023] FCA 1384 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (35)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  2. Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451 Cited cited 243×
  3. Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 Cited cited 654×
  4. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNPG [2010] FCAFC 51 Cited cited 92×
  5. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16 Cited cited 1,026×
  6. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Cited cited 1,516×
  7. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSRS [2014] FCAFC 16 Cited cited 142×
  8. Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83 Cited cited 114×
  9. Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 15 Cited cited 97×
  10. ARG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 174 Cited cited 135×
  11. DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2 Cited cited 167×
  12. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216 Cited cited 121×
  13. Minister for Home Affairs v HSKJ [2018] FCAFC 217 Cited cited 54×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30 Cited cited 620×
  15. PQSM v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1540 Cited cited 12×
  16. FCFY v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2019] FCA 1990 Cited cited 23×
  17. BIL17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 6 Cited cited 11×
  18. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3 Cited cited 693×
  19. BNB17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 304 Cited cited 11×
  20. Downes v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 54 Cited cited 7×
  21. Bale v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 646 Cited cited 22×
  22. DQM18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 110 Cited cited 69×
  23. Guclukol v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 148 Cited cited 28×
  24. AXT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 32 Cited cited 43×
  25. Chamoun v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 66 Cited cited 46×
  26. [2021] AATA 1039 Cited cited 2×
  27. WQRJ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 736 Cited cited 12×
  28. Okoh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 84 Cited cited 8×
  29. MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17 Cited cited 384×
  30. KXXH v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 111 Cited cited 27×
  31. Dunasemant v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 13 Cited cited 7×
  32. FHHM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 19 Cited cited 33×
  33. Plaintiff M1-2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17 Cited cited 303×
  34. Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26 Cited cited 192×
  35. ECE21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCAFC 52 Cited cited 26×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.