Pinpoint · Judgment search

Guclukol v Minister for Home Affairs

[2020] FCAFC 148 ; (2020) 279 FCR 611

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 4 September 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 28 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Cited 27

2021: 14 citing judgments, 1 negative 2022: 5 citing judgments 2023: 7 citing judgments 2024: 2 citing judgments 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Okoh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 84 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  2. EXT20 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 629 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  3. RGKY v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 750 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Tohi v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 125 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 57× · judgment
  5. Ibrahim v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 914 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. QJYD v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 962 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  7. KXXH v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1229 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  8. JZGW v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1333 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  9. Montgomery v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1423 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  10. QDQY v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1394 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  11. CVRZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 205 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 3× · judgment
  12. Zheng v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1509 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  13. LGLH v Minister for Immigration Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1529 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  14. Oke v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1567 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  15. FGBP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 253 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  16. EXT20 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCAFC 72 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 15× · judgment
  17. QDQY v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 82 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment
  18. Au v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 125 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 18× · judgment
  19. Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs v RGKY [2022] FCAFC 177 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 4× · judgment
  20. BFM21 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 467 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  21. Faingataa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 505 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  22. EUF20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 130 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 5× · judgment
  23. Mamatta v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1077 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  24. Moananu v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1146 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  25. Ngatoko v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1165 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  26. BJI20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1632 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  27. BWS22 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 387 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  28. Rana v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 1002 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (28)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×
  2. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  3. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×
  4. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30 Cited cited 648×
  5. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32 Cited cited 456×
  6. SZBQJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 143 Cited cited 3×
  7. Lafu v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 140 Cited cited 78×
  8. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Khadgi [2010] FCAFC 145 Cited cited 67×
  9. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16 Cited cited 1,026×
  10. MZZUG v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1151 Cited cited 20×
  11. Rares and Foster JJ; SZVVR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 71 AAR 11 Cited
  12. Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 348 Cited cited 43×
  13. Telstra Corporation Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2017] FCA 316 Cited cited 7×
  14. AVU15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 608 Cited cited 9×
  15. Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107 Cited cited 330×
  16. BSE17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1926 Cited cited 9×
  17. Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116 Cited cited 132×
  18. Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo [2018] FCAFC 151 Cited cited 153×
  19. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DRP17 [2018] FCAFC 198 Cited cited 28×
  20. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216 Cited cited 121×
  21. Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225 Cited cited 166×
  22. Ezegbe v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 216 Cited cited 42×
  23. Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188 Cited cited 229×
  24. (2020) 27 AJ Admin L 70 Cited cited 4×
  25. Guclukol v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 61 Cited cited 10×
  26. Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 109 Cited cited 75×
  27. DQM18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 110 Cited cited 69×
  28. EVK18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 49 Cited cited 23×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.