Pinpoint · Judgment search

De Pyle v Commonwealth of Australia

[2023] FCA 597

Federal Court of Australia · 9 June 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 2 citing judgments 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. De Pyle v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2023] FCA 751 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Chan v Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission (No 2) [2023] FCA 1538 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  3. [Redacted] v Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCA 185 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  4. Commonwealth of Australia v De Pyle [2024] FCAFC 43 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (23)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Attorney-General v Leveller Magazine Ltd [1979] AC 440 Cited cited 62×
  2. Church of Scientology Inc v Woodward [1982] HCA 78 Cited cited 70×
  3. Alister v The Queen [1984] HCA 85 Cited cited 311×
  4. John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Police Tribunal of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 465 Cited cited 241×
  5. John Fairfax Group Pty Ltd v Local Court of New South Wales (1991) 26 NSWLR 131 Applied or followed cited 119×
  6. John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd & Anor v District Court of NSW & Ors [2004] NSWCA 324 Cited cited 176×
  7. R. v. KWOK, Daniel Sweeseang, R. v. ONG, Jenny Lai Chin, R. v. TAN, Raymond Aik Tong, R. v. YOE, Hosea Paryud Saputra [2005] NSWCCA 245 Cited cited 44×
  8. Richardson v Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 1306 Cited cited 3×
  9. The Food Improvers Pty Ltd v BGR Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 1394 Cited cited 7×
  10. Regina v Khazaal [2006] NSWSC 1061 Cited cited 9×
  11. Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21 Cited cited 331×
  12. Hogan v Hinch [2011] HCA 4 Applied or followed cited 162×
  13. Rinehart v Welker [2011] NSWCA 403 Cited cited 178×
  14. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 1430 Cited cited 60×
  15. Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd v Ibrahim [2012] NSWCCA 125 Cited cited 129×
  16. Bianca Hope Rinehart v Georgina Hope Rinehart [2014] FCA 1241 Cited cited 30×
  17. Abbey Laboratories Pty Ltd v Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority [2016] FCA 704 Cited
  18. Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2019] FCA 36 Cited cited 17×
  19. AB (a pseudonym) v CD (a pseudonym) [2019] HCA 6 Cited cited 39×
  20. The Country Care Group Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (No 2) [2020] FCAFC 44 Cited cited 40×
  21. Leyonhjelm v Hanson-Young [2021] FCAFC 22 Cited cited 12×
  22. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v State Grid International Australia Development Company Limited (Application for Non-Publication Orders No 2) [2022] FCA 719 Cited cited 6×
  23. Lee v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2023] FCAFC 22 Cited cited 14×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.