Pinpoint · Judgment search

Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Hansen

[2023] NSWCA 189

NSW Court of Appeal · 15 August 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW v “A” (a pseudonym) [2023] NSWCA 258 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Armstrong [2024] NSWCA 98 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (7)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Re Davis [1947] HCA 53 Cited cited 92×
  2. Ziems v The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales [1957] HCA 46 Cited cited 209×
  3. A Solicitor v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2004] HCA 1 Cited cited 139×
  4. Council of the NSW Bar Association v Power [2008] NSWCA 135 Cited cited 47×
  5. Stanoevski v The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2008] NSWCA 93 Cited cited 42×
  6. Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Zhukovska [2020] NSWCA 163 Cited cited 17×
  7. R v Hansen [2021] NSWDC 457 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.