Pinpoint · Judgment search

ALJ22 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

[2024] FCA 1427

Federal Court of Australia · 12 December 2024 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (33)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Osborne v Rowlett (1880) 13 Ch D 774 Cited cited 4×
  2. Lorimer v Smail [1911] HCA 44 Cited cited 8×
  3. Metropolitan Gas Co v Federated Gas Employees' Industrial Union [1925] HCA 5 Cited cited 44×
  4. R v Carter; Ex parte Kisch (1934) 52 CLR 221 Cited cited 16×
  5. Burton v Honan [1952] HCA 30 Cited cited 36×
  6. Ward v Williams [1955] HCA 4 Cited cited 107×
  7. Re Brian Lawlor Automotive Pty Ltd and Collector of Customs (NSW) (1978) 1 ALD 167 Cited cited 40×
  8. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation Ltd v Commissioner of Pay-roll Tax [1982] 2 NSWLR 52 Cited cited 9×
  9. Colpitts v Australian Telecommunications Commission [1986] FCA 1 Cited cited 28×
  10. Biga Nominees Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1991) 21 ATR 1459 Cited cited 2×
  11. Department of Social Security v Hodgson [1992] FCA 338 Cited cited 33×
  12. Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×
  13. R v Brown [1996] AC 543 Cited cited 33×
  14. Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×
  15. NATB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 292 Cited cited 44×
  16. SAAK v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 4) [2004] FCA 104 Cited cited 6×
  17. Commonwealth Bank Officers Superannuation Corporation Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCAFC 244 Cited cited 12×
  18. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v MZXGJ [2006] FCA 1594. [2006] FCA 1594 Cited
  19. XYZ v The Commonwealth [2006] HCA 25 Cited cited 38×
  20. SZGME v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCAFC 91 Cited cited 30×
  21. Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31 Cited cited 405×
  22. Campbell v R [2008] NSWCCA 214 Cited cited 24×
  23. Undershaft (No 1) Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCA 41 Not followed cited 31×
  24. St.George Bank Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCAFC 62 Cited cited 13×
  25. Plaintiff S10/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] HCA 31 Cited cited 112×
  26. Sea Shepherd Australia Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCAFC 68 Cited cited 16×
  27. Yasmin v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia [2015] FCAFC 145 Cited cited 16×
  28. SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34 Cited cited 583×
  29. Commissioner of Taxation v Apted [2021] FCAFC 45 Cited cited 3×
  30. Citta Hobart Pty Ltd v Cawthorn [2022] HCA 16 Cited cited 69×
  31. Davis v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 10 Cited cited 40×
  32. Ho v Minister for Health [2024] FCA 657 Cited
  33. LPDT v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2024] HCA 12 Cited cited 101×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.