Pinpoint · Judgment search

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Ltd (No 3)

[2024] FCA 83

Federal Court of Australia · 14 February 2024 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2024: 2 citing judgments 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v EnergyAustralia Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1126 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Meg's Flowers Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1435 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 762 Cited cited 132×
  2. N W Frozen Foods Proprietary Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [1996] FCA 1134 Cited cited 507×
  3. Australian Consumer & Competition Commission v Z-tek Computer Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 871 Applied or followed cited 76×
  4. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABB Transmission and Distribution Limited (No. 2) [2002] FCA 559 Cited cited 72×
  5. Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20 Cited cited 319×
  6. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Woolworths Limited [2016] FCA 44 Cited cited 40×
  7. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Clinica Internationale Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 62 Cited cited 24×
  8. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Acquire Learning & Careers Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 602 Applied or followed cited 14×
  9. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Oakmoore Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 1170 Cited cited 10×
  10. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited [2018] FCA 703 Cited cited 15×
  11. Flight Centre Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 53 Cited cited 68×
  12. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Wooldridge [2019] FCAFC 172 Cited cited 24×
  13. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 724 Cited cited 6×
  14. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1493 Cited cited 9×
  15. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dodo Services Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 589 Cited cited 3×
  16. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2021] FCAFC 49 Cited cited 60×
  17. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 250 Cited cited 2×
  18. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dell Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] FCA 983 Cited cited 7×
  19. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Limited [2023] FCAFC 45 Cited cited 11×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.