Pinpoint · Judgment search

TCXM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

[2026] HCA 13

High Court of Australia · 6 May 2026 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (88)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Fong Yue Ting v United States (1893) 149 US 698 Cited cited 2×
  2. Li Sing v United States (1901) 180 US 486 Cited cited 2×
  3. Robtelmes v Brenan [1906] HCA 58 Cited cited 32×
  4. Ah Yin v Christie [1907] HCA 25 Cited cited 6×
  5. R v Macfarlane; Ex parte O'Flanagan and O'Kelly [1923] HCA 39 Cited cited 52×
  6. Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; In re Yates [1925] HCA 53 Cited cited 86×
  7. R v Archdall and Roskruge; Ex parte Carrigan and Brown [1928] HCA 18 Cited cited 19×
  8. Victorian Stevedoring and General Contracting Co Pty Ltd v Dignan [1931] HCA 34 Cited cited 185×
  9. O'Keefe v Calwell [1949] HCA 6 Cited cited 34×
  10. Koon Wing Lau v Calwell [1949] HCA 65 Cited cited 61×
  11. R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia [1956] HCA 10 Cited cited 172×
  12. Ex parte Henry [1975] HCA 62 Cited cited 15×
  13. Salemi v MacKellar (No 2) [1977] HCA 26 Cited cited 83×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1981) 149 CLR 139 Cited cited 10×
  15. Pochi v Macphee [1982] HCA 60 Cited cited 56×
  16. Attorney-General (NSW) v Commonwealth Savings Bank [1986] HCA 22 Cited cited 10×
  17. Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration [1992] HCA 64 Cited cited 352×
  18. Coco v The Queen [1994] HCA 15 Cited cited 371×
  19. Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh [1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×
  20. Ousley v The Queen [1997] HCA 49 Cited cited 131×
  21. Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×
  22. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte SE [1998] HCA 72 Cited cited 14×
  23. WAIS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1625 Cited cited 32×
  24. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11 Cited cited 579×
  25. Applicant M38/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 458 Cited cited 7×
  26. M38/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 131 Cited cited 70×
  27. NATB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 185 Cited cited 9×
  28. NATB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 292 Cited cited 44×
  29. Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×
  30. WAJZ, WAKA, WAGF, WAKB, WAKE and WADX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCA 1332 Cited cited 11×
  31. Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37 Cited cited 237×
  32. Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union [2004] HCA 40 Cited cited 137×
  33. Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 by their next friend GS [2004] HCA 49 Cited cited 62×
  34. Albarran v Members of the Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board [2007] HCA 23 Cited cited 28×
  35. Visnic v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2007] HCA 24 Cited cited 18×
  36. Attorney-General (Cth) v Alinta Limited [2008] HCA 2 Cited cited 42×
  37. Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2009] HCA 23 Cited cited 61×
  38. Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23 Cited cited 283×
  39. Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 41 Cited cited 299×
  40. Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] HCA 32 Cited cited 143×
  41. Australian Education Union v General Manager of Fair Work Australia [2012] HCA 19 Cited cited 33×
  42. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQRB [2013] FCAFC 33 Cited cited 137×
  43. Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission [2013] HCA 39 Cited cited 164×
  44. Plaintiff M76/2013 v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] HCA 53 Cited cited 74×
  45. Tajjour v New South Wales [2014] HCA 35 Cited cited 39×
  46. Duncan v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2015] HCA 32 Cited cited 13×
  47. Australian Communications and Media Authority v Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 7 Cited cited 48×
  48. Plaintiff M68-2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] HCA 1 Cited cited 48×
  49. Plaintiff M96A/2016 v Commonwealth of Australia [2017] HCA 16 Cited cited 35×
  50. CRI026 v The Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 19 Cited cited 33×
  51. Falzon v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 2 Cited cited 100×
  52. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30 Cited cited 620×
  53. Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34 Cited cited 627×
  54. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3 Cited cited 693×
  55. Love v Commonwealth of Australia [2020] HCA 3 Cited cited 60×
  56. (2021) 43 Sydney Law Review 589 Cited
  57. Arthur as litigation representative for CYG20 v Commonwealth of Australia [2021] FCA 259 Cited cited 6×
  58. WKMZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 55 Cited cited 31×
  59. Zhang v Commissioner of Police [2021] HCA 16 Cited cited 14×
  60. Commonwealth of Australia v AJL20 [2021] HCA 21 Cited cited 71×
  61. Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Western Australia [2021] HCA 30 Cited cited 19×
  62. Minister for Home Affairs v Benbrika [2021] HCA 4 Cited cited 32×
  63. Palmer v Western Australia [2021] HCA 5 Cited cited 34×
  64. Alexander v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 276 CLR 336 Cited cited 7×
  65. BHL19 v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2022] FCA 313 Cited cited 6×
  66. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13 Cited cited 211×
  67. Stephens v The Queen [2022] HCA 31 Cited cited 33×
  68. (2023) 280 CLR 137 Cited cited 11×
  69. Disorganized Developments Pty Ltd v South Australia (2023) 280 CLR 515 Cited cited 3×
  70. Jones v The Commonwealth (2023) 280 CLR 62 Cited cited 3×
  71. (2024) 278 CLR 628 Cited cited 2×
  72. (2024) 280 CLR 321 Cited cited 7×
  73. Hurt v The King (2024) 281 CLR 286 Cited cited 5×
  74. ASF17 v The Commonwealth (2024) 282 CLR 172 Cited
  75. (2024) 99 ALJR 1 Cited cited 9×
  76. YBFZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] HCA 40 Cited cited 12×
  77. Badari v Minister for Territory Families and Urban Housing (2025) 100 ALJR 30 Cited cited 2×
  78. (2025) 34 Griffith Law Review 151 Cited
  79. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v MZAPC (2025) 421 ALR 483 Cited cited 2×
  80. Bogan v Estate of Smedley (2025) 422 ALR 94 Cited
  81. Farmer v Minister for Home Affairs (2025) 425 ALR 116 Cited cited 4×
  82. Badari v Minister for Territory Families and Urban Housing (2025) 426 ALR 212 Cited cited 2×
  83. CD v The Commonwealth (2025) 99 ALJR 1388 Cited
  84. Farmer v Minister for Home Affairs (2025) 99 ALJR 1408 Cited cited 4×
  85. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v MZAPC (2025) 99 ALJR 486 Cited cited 2×
  86. Bogan v Estate of Smedley (2025) 99 ALJR 619 Cited cited 2×
  87. TCXM v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FCA 540 Cited
  88. EGH19 v Commonwealth of Australia [2026] HCA 7 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.