Pinpoint · Judgment search

Wiest v Director of Public Prosecutions

[1988] FCA 450 ; (1988) 23 FCR 472

Federal Court of Australia · 1988 · Find the judgment

Cited by 70 indexed judgments

All Not followed 1 Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 11 Cited 57

1995: 2 citing judgments 1996: 2 citing judgments 1997: 1 citing judgment 1998: 2 citing judgments 1999: 8 citing judgments 2000: 6 citing judgments 2001: 3 citing judgments 2002: 5 citing judgments, 1 negative 2003: 4 citing judgments, 1 negative 2004: 7 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 2 citing judgments 2007: 1 citing judgment 2008: 4 citing judgments 2009: 5 citing judgments 2010: 1 citing judgment 2011: 2 citing judgments 2013: 2 citing judgments 2014: 2 citing judgments 2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 5 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 1988 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Tran v The Commonwealth [2009] FCA 921 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  2. Nikolaidis v Pittwater Council [2009] NSWLEC 227 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  3. O’Donoghue v Ireland [2009] FCAFC 184 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 9× · judgment
  4. Zentai v Honourable Brendan O’Connor (No 3) [2010] FCA 691 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  5. New Zealand v Johnston [2011] FCAFC 2 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 14× · judgment
  6. Chand v RailCorp [2011] NSWCA 79 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  7. Honourable Brendan O'Connor v Adamas [2013] FCAFC 14 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 8× · judgment
  8. Rowe v Emmanuel College [2013] FCA 939 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  9. Kennedy v Comcare [2014] FCA 82 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  10. Kommatas v Hellenic Republic [2014] FCA 1224 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  11. Matson v United States of America [2016] FCA 1245 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  12. Liem v Republic of Indonesia [2017] FCA 1303 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  13. Liem v Republic of Indonesia [2018] FCAFC 135 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 9× · judgment
  14. Rojas v United States of America [2019] FCA 22 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  15. Commonwealth of Australia v Snell [2019] FCAFC 57 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 17× · judgment
  16. Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd v Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1734 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  17. Rivas v Republic of Chile [2019] FCA 1940 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  18. Dimitriou v Pineview Property Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 2123 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  19. Rivas v Republic of Chile [2021] FCA 693 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  20. Coates-Kelly v New Zealand [2022] FCAFC 131 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.